These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37974713)

  • 1. Comparative Study of Surgical Outcome in Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Septoplasty Using Nasal Surgical Questionnaire (NSQ): A Randomized Control Trial.
    Ahmed R; Hiremath CS; Khavasi P; Malashetti SP
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(4):3610-3620. PubMed ID: 37974713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic septoplasty for treating nasal septal deviations compared with conventional septoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim DH; Kim SW; Hwang SH
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2023 Mar; 48(2):108-121. PubMed ID: 36537862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Outcomes of Conventional Septoplasty Versus Endoscopic Septoplasty using Freer's Incision in Symptomatic Deviated Nasal Septum.
    Khadgi S; Gurung U; Pradhan B; Tripathi P
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2021 Jul-Sept.; 19(75):339-344. PubMed ID: 36254421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of endoscopic septoplasty versus conventional septoplasty.
    Sathyaki DC; Geetha C; Munishwara GB; Mohan M; Manjuanth K
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 66(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 24822154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Conventional Septoplasty.
    Bhardwaj H; Kalsotra G; Kalsotra P; Singh P; Saraf A
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Sep; 75(3):1724-1730. PubMed ID: 37636711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating surgical outcomes of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty using subjective and objective methods.
    Doomra S; Singh M; Singh B; Kaushal A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1372-1377. PubMed ID: 31607726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic Septoplasty Versus Traditional Septoplasty for Treating Deviated Nasal Septum: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Na'ara S; Kaptzan B; Gil Z; Ostrovsky D
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Nov; 100(9):673-678. PubMed ID: 32339048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Efficacy of Septoplasty with Nonsurgical Management in Improving Nasal Obstruction in Patients with Deviated Nasal Septum - A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Srinivasan DG; Hegde J; Ramasamy K; Raja K; Rajaa S; Ganesan S; Velayutham P; Alexander A; Saxena SK
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 26(2):e226-e232. PubMed ID: 35602281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective and Subjective Analysis for Efficaciousness of Nasal Airway in Patients Undergoing Conventional and Endoscopic Septoplasty: A Comparative Study.
    Haque M; Mukhopadhyay S
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(Suppl 3):4816-4823. PubMed ID: 36742918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparison of endoscopic septoplasty and conventional septoplasty: A PRISMA analysis.
    Trimartani K; Damara FA
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2023 Sep; 140(5):211-219. PubMed ID: 37169626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur.
    Bothra R; Mathur NN
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):737-41. PubMed ID: 19046471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Study of Improvement of Nasal Symptoms Following Septoplasty with Partial Inferior Turbinectomy Versus Septoplasty Alone in Adults by NOSE Scale: A Prospective Study.
    Dinesh Kumar R; Rajashekar M
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 68(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 27508126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The use of hypertonic sea-water solution in patients after surgery of the nose and paranasal sinuses].
    Rapiejko P; Jurkiewicz D
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2010; 64(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 20476589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic versus conventional septoplasty: objective/subjective data on 276 patients.
    Garzaro M; Dell'Era V; Riva G; Raimondo L; Pecorari G; Aluffi Valletti P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 276(6):1707-1711. PubMed ID: 30895435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Nasal Surgical Questionnaire for Monitoring Results of Septoplasty.
    Haye R; Tarangen M; Shiryaeva O; Døsen LK
    Int J Otolaryngol; 2015; 2015():563639. PubMed ID: 26612987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Endonasal and External Septoplasty for Treatment of Buckled Caudal Septal Deviation.
    Awan NU; Azeem M; Cheema KM
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Jan; 31(1):51-54. PubMed ID: 33546533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Powered endoscopic septoplasty for septal deviation and isolated spurs.
    Raynor EM
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2005; 7(6):410-2. PubMed ID: 16301463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laser-assisted outpatient septoplasty and laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty for nasal obstruction and snoring.
    Neruntarat C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Jun; 88 Suppl 1():S66-72. PubMed ID: 16862670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To Study the Long Term Outcome of Endoscopic Septoplasty with Microdebrider Assisted Inferior Turbinoplasty (MAIT) Versus Medial Flap Turbinoplasty (MFT).
    Sandhu KS; Singh SP; Thomas O; Choudhary P; Singh A; Singh M
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Oct; 74(Suppl 2):863-869. PubMed ID: 36452757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic Septoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of 415 Cases.
    Kulkarni SV; Kulkarni VP; Burse K; Bharath M; Bharadwaj C; Sancheti V
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Sep; 67(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 26405659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.