These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3797480)

  • 21. Differences between spectral dependencies in auditory and phonetic temporal processing: Relevance to the perception of voicing in initial stops.
    Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 7108043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Underlying mechanism for categorical perception: tone-onset time and voice-onset time evidence of Hebrew voicing.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Rotshtein S; Taitelbaum R
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2002; 13(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 16411426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception.
    Kong EJ; Lee H
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 28937301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of the voicing contrast: perception of stop consonants.
    Zlatin MA; Koenigsknecht RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 1186163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An acoustic and perceptual study of initial stops produced by profoundly hearing impaired adolescents.
    Khouw E; Ciocca V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Jan; 21(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 17364614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Temporal and spectral cue use for initial plosive voicing perception by hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children and adults.
    Holden-Pitt LD; Hazan V; Revoile SG; Edward DM; Droge J
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1995; 30(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 8634497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-linguistic interaction in trilingual phonological development: the role of the input in the acquisition of the voicing contrast.
    Mayr R; Montanari S
    J Child Lang; 2015 Sep; 42(5):1006-35. PubMed ID: 25330782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants.
    Elangovan S; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):761-74. PubMed ID: 18769272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clear speech production of Korean stops: changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies.
    Kang KH; Guion SG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3909-17. PubMed ID: 19206816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of VOT in Turkish speakers with aphasia.
    Kopkalli-Yavuz H; Mavis I; Akyildiz D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Apr; 25(4):287-301. PubMed ID: 21091206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.
    Chang CB; Mishler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2700-10. PubMed ID: 23039462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laryngeal Contrast in Qatari Arabic: Effect of Speaking Rate on Voice Onset Time.
    Kulikov V
    Phonetica; 2020; 77(3):163-185. PubMed ID: 31018216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phonological versus phonetic cues in native and non-native listening: Korean and Dutch listeners' perception of Dutch and English consonants.
    Cho T; McQueen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3085-96. PubMed ID: 16708963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement?
    Holt LL; Lotto AJ; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):764-74. PubMed ID: 11248980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English.
    Flege JE; Hillenbrand J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):508-17. PubMed ID: 3950204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of speaking rate changes on native and nonnative speech production.
    Schmidt AM; Flege JE
    Phonetica; 1995; 52(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 7862748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temporal cues to onset voicing contrasts in Australian English-speaking children.
    Millasseau J; Bruggeman L; Yuen I; Demuth K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jan; 149(1):348. PubMed ID: 33514122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of categorical identification of native and non-native bilabial stops: infants, children and adults.
    Burnham DK; Earnshaw LJ; Clark JE
    J Child Lang; 1991 Jun; 18(2):231-60. PubMed ID: 1874826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adult perception of stop consonant voicing in American-English-learning toddlers: Voice onset time and secondary cues.
    Hitchcock ER; Koenig LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jul; 150(1):460. PubMed ID: 34340497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Voice and Emphasis in Arabic Coronal Stops: Evidence for Phonological Compensation.
    Kulikov V
    Lang Speech; 2022 Mar; 65(1):73-104. PubMed ID: 33455538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.