136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37975525)
1. Translucent monolithic zirconia titanium-supported FP1 full-arch prosthesis: A novel proof of concept to address esthetic, functional, and biologic challenges.
Pelekanos S; Ntovas P; Rizou V; Pozzi A
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 37975525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up.
Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; DeFuria C; Amin S; Kudara Y; Weber HP
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28792115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of full-arch implant-supported fixed restorations made of monolithic zirconia luted to a titanium bar: A retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 16 months.
Mijiritsky E; Elad A; Krausz R; Ivanova V; Zlatev S
J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104675. PubMed ID: 37607658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital Workflow for Implant Rehabilitation with Double Full-Arch Monolithic Zirconia Prostheses.
Papaspyridakos P; Chochlidakis K; Kang K; Chen YW; Alghfeli A; Kudara Y; Weber HP
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):460-465. PubMed ID: 32185825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Titanium versus zirconia complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A comparison of plaque accumulation.
Curiel-Aguilera FP; Griffiths GR; Rossmann JA; Gonzalez JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):369-375. PubMed ID: 34879988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study.
Tischler M; Patch C; Bidra AS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 29559219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complete Digital Workflow for Mandibular Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation in 3 Appointments.
Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Bathija A; Kang K; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2021 Jul; 30(6):548-552. PubMed ID: 33811713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design.
Rojas Vizcaya F
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):501-508. PubMed ID: 27570943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up.
Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Barlattani A
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 24188105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-assisted implant placement and full-arch immediate loading with digitally prefabricated provisional prostheses without cast: a prospective pilot cohort study.
Makarov N; Pompa G; Papi P
Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Sep; 7(1):80. PubMed ID: 34486078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective Cohort Evaluation of Full-Arch Zirconia Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Al-Tarawneh S; Thalji G; Shonberg D; Fayz L; Cooper L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):381-390. PubMed ID: 37083903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications and Clinical Considerations of the Implant-Retained Zirconia Complete-Arch Prosthesis with Various Opposing Dentitions.
Gonzalez J; Triplett RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):864-869. PubMed ID: 28708920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical assessment of different implant-supported esthetic crown systems fabricated with semi-digital workflow: Two-year prospective study.
Salem MT; El-Layeh M; El-Farag SAA; Salem AS; Attia A
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1247-1262. PubMed ID: 36120840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Performance of Complete-Arch Implant- Supported Rehabilitations Using Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Restorations Bonded to CAD/CAM Titanium and Zirconia Frameworks up to 5 Years.
Fabbri G; Ban G; Pulcini C; Cerutti A; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 Nov; 30(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 35438262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-guided implant surgery and full-arch immediate loading with prefabricated-metal framework-provisional prosthesis created from a 3D printed model.
Lanis A; Alvarez Del Canto O; Barriga P; Polido WD; Morton D
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 May; 31(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 30790431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia frameworks for implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prosthesis.
Tiossi R; Gomes ÉA; Faria ACL; Rodrigues RCS; Ribeiro RF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):860-866. PubMed ID: 28772024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
