137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37975525)
41. Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study.
Cappare P; Ferrini F; Mariani G; Nagni M; Cattoni F
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(4 Suppl. 1):99-112. PubMed ID: 34425665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Computer-assisted, template-guided immediate implant placement and loading in the mandible: a case report.
Spielau T; Hauschild U; Katsoulis J
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):55. PubMed ID: 30975113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Metal-Zirconia Implant Fixed Hybrid Full-Arch Prosthesis: An Alternative Technique for Fabrication.
Stumpel LJ; Haechler W
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2018 Mar; 39(3):176-181. PubMed ID: 29493247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns.
Joda T; Brägger U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1304-1306. PubMed ID: 25040237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review.
Abdulmajeed AA; Lim KG; Närhi TO; Cooper LF
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):672-677.e1. PubMed ID: 26809220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of porcelain veneer fracture in implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with a framework of either titanium, cobalt-chromium, or zirconia: An in vitro study.
Vahnström M; Johansson PH; Svanborg P; Stenport VF
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Apr; 8(2):544-551. PubMed ID: 35313086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface.
Venezia P; Torsello F; Cavalcanti R; D'Amato S
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 25979446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Digital Workflow With a Triple Scanning Technique for Implant Rehabilitation in the Esthetic Zone.
Papaspyridakos P; Mariano A; De Souza A; Kotina E; Kudara Y; Kang K
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 33001661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation.
Monaco C; Ragazzini N; Scheda L; Evangelisti E
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):383-385. PubMed ID: 29191608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses produced from an intraoral scan by using an auxiliary device and from an elastomeric impression: A pilot clinical trial.
Roig E; Roig M; Garza LC; Costa S; Maia P; Espona J
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):404-414. PubMed ID: 33610331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Randomized clinical trial of zirconia and polyetheretherketone implant abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: A 5-year evaluation.
Ayyadanveettil P; Thavakkara V; Latha N; Pavanan M; Saraswathy A; Kuruniyan MS
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1275-1281. PubMed ID: 33933267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An esthetics rehabilitation with computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing technology.
Mazaro JV; de Mello CC; Zavanelli AC; Santiago JF; Amoroso AP; Pellizzer EP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 25576121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Esthetic and Clinical Performance of Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Crowns Made with Prefabricated or CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments: A Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial.
Wittneben JG; Gavric J; Belser UC; Bornstein MM; Joda T; Chappuis V; Sailer I; Brägger U
J Dent Res; 2017 Feb; 96(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 27927884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Clinical outcome of single posterior implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated using full digital workflow and conventional workflow: a 3-year follow-up].
Gao SH; Guo DN; Zhou YS; Pan SX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 57(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 35280005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Zirconia abutments in the anterior region: A systematic review of mechanical and esthetic outcomes.
Naveau A; Rignon-Bret C; Wulfman C
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):775-781.e1. PubMed ID: 30617036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study.
Drago C
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):402-408. PubMed ID: 27416302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study.
De Angelis P; Passarelli PC; Gasparini G; Boniello R; D'Amato G; De Angelis S
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 31202552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
