BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37975866)

  • 1. gmcoda: Graphical model for multiple compositional vectors in microbiome studies.
    Fang H
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 39(11):. PubMed ID: 37975866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CCLasso: correlation inference for compositional data through Lasso.
    Fang H; Huang C; Zhao H; Deng M
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3172-80. PubMed ID: 26048598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. fastCCLasso: a fast and efficient algorithm for estimating correlation matrix from compositional data.
    Zhang S; Fang H; Hu T
    Bioinformatics; 2024 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 38730540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. gCoda: Conditional Dependence Network Inference for Compositional Data.
    Fang H; Huang C; Zhao H; Deng M
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 28489411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct interaction network inference for compositional data via codaloss.
    Chen L; He S; Zhai Y; Deng M
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(6):2050037. PubMed ID: 33106076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compositional data network analysis via lasso penalized D-trace loss.
    Yuan H; He S; Deng M
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3404-3411. PubMed ID: 31220226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compositional data analysis of the microbiome: fundamentals, tools, and challenges.
    Tsilimigras MC; Fodor AA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 May; 26(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 27255738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards Quantitative Microbiome Community Profiling Using Internal Standards.
    Lin Y; Gifford S; Ducklow H; Schofield O; Cassar N
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 85(5):. PubMed ID: 30552195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing a 16S rRNA Sequencing Dataset with the Microbiome Helper Workflow.
    Douglas GM; Comeau AM; Langille MGI
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():131-141. PubMed ID: 30298252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-throughput qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing as complementary methods for the investigation of the cheese microbiota.
    Dreier M; Meola M; Berthoud H; Shani N; Wechsler D; Junier P
    BMC Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35130830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It's all relative: analyzing microbiome data as compositions.
    Gloor GB; Wu JR; Pawlowsky-Glahn V; Egozcue JJ
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 May; 26(5):322-9. PubMed ID: 27143475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-resolution ISR amplicon sequencing reveals personalized oral microbiome.
    Mukherjee C; Beall CJ; Griffen AL; Leys EJ
    Microbiome; 2018 Sep; 6(1):153. PubMed ID: 30185233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phylogeny-based classification of microbial communities.
    Tanaseichuk O; Borneman J; Jiang T
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 24369151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
    Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
    Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A maximum-type microbial differential abundance test with application to high-dimensional microbiome data analyses.
    Li Z; Yu X; Guo H; Lee T; Hu J
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2022; 12():988717. PubMed ID: 36389165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to Count Our Microbes? The Effect of Different Quantitative Microbiome Profiling Approaches.
    Galazzo G; van Best N; Benedikter BJ; Janssen K; Bervoets L; Driessen C; Oomen M; Lucchesi M; van Eijck PH; Becker HEF; Hornef MW; Savelkoul PH; Stassen FRM; Wolffs PF; Penders J
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():403. PubMed ID: 32850498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring microbial co-occurrence networks from amplicon data: a systematic evaluation.
    Kishore D; Birzu G; Hu Z; DeLisi C; Korolev KS; Segrè D
    mSystems; 2023 Aug; 8(4):e0096122. PubMed ID: 37338270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
    Whelan FJ; Surette MG
    Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal probabilistic modeling of bacterial compositions derived from 16S rRNA sequencing.
    Äijö T; Müller CL; Bonneau R
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(3):372-380. PubMed ID: 28968799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.