These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37976035)

  • 1. Judgments of learning reflect the encoding of contexts, not items: evidence from a test of recognition exclusion.
    Ünal B; Benjamin AS
    Memory; 2024; 32(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 37976035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
    Jang Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.
    Zimdahl MF; Undorf M
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):743-765. PubMed ID: 36521154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do judgments of learning predict automatic influences of memory?
    Undorf M; Böhm S; Cüpper L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):882-96. PubMed ID: 26595068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metamemory judgments have dissociable reactivity effects on item and interitem relational memory.
    Zhao W; Li J; Shanks DR; Li B; Hu X; Yang C; Luo L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):557-574. PubMed ID: 36848046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy.
    Hertzog C; Hines JC; Touron DR
    Arch Sci Psychol; 2013; 1(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 25914865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "You don't know what this means to me" - Uncovering idiosyncratic influences on metamemory judgments.
    Undorf M; Navarro-Báez S; Bröder A
    Cognition; 2022 May; 222():105011. PubMed ID: 35144099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do Beliefs About Font Size Affect Retrospective Metamemory Judgments in Addition to Prospective Judgments?
    Luna K; Albuquerque PB
    Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):172-184. PubMed ID: 35975625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?
    Hu X; Li T; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142351. PubMed ID: 26556478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions.
    Tatz JR; Peynircioğlu ZF
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 31732926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate judgments of learning predict subsequent recollection: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 22732027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Word frequency effects on judgments of learning: More than just beliefs.
    Mendes PS; Luna K; Albuquerque PB
    J Gen Psychol; 2021; 148(2):124-148. PubMed ID: 31880498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metamemory that matters: judgments of importance can engage responsible remembering.
    Murphy DH; Castel AD
    Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):271-283. PubMed ID: 33726614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.