These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37977990)

  • 1. Biomechanical behavior and Weibull survival of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different marginal designs: A 3D finite element analysis.
    AboElhassan RG; Watts DC; Alamoush RA; Elraggal A
    Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 37977990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different cavity design and CAD-CAM materials under a static and vertical load: A finite element analysis.
    Abtahi S; Alikhasi M; Siadat H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):600.e1-600.e8. PubMed ID: 35016795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of margin design and restorative material on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Zheng Z; Sun J; Jiang L; Wu Y; He J; Ruan W; Yan W
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Feb; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 35120525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of different CAD/CAM materials on internal and marginal adaptations and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations with: 3D finite element analysis.
    El-Farag SAA; Elerian FA; Elsherbiny AA; Abbas MH
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):421. PubMed ID: 37357307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis.
    Zheng Z; He Y; Ruan W; Ling Z; Zheng C; Gai Y; Yan W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):890-899. PubMed ID: 32471627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical reinforcement by CAD-CAM materials affects stress distributions of posterior composite bridges: 3D finite element analysis.
    Elraggal A; Abdelraheem IM; Watts DC; Roy S; Dommeti VK; Alshabib A; Althaqafi KA; Afifi RR
    Dent Mater; 2024 May; 40(5):869-877. PubMed ID: 38609774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis.
    Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R
    Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance.
    Einhorn M; DuVall N; Wajdowicz M; Brewster J; Roberts H
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e237-e242. PubMed ID: 28985446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Helal MA; Wang Z
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials.
    Pedrollo Lise D; Van Ende A; De Munck J; Umeda Suzuki TY; Cardoso Vieira LC; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
    Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
    Carvalho AO; Bruzi G; Anderson RE; Maia HP; Giannini M; Magne P
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 26266647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of stress distribution and risk of failure for maxillary premolar restored by occlusal veneer with different CAD/CAM materials and preparation designs.
    Huang XQ; Hong NR; Zou LY; Wu SY; Li Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Sep; 24(9):3157-3167. PubMed ID: 32034548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
    Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of margin designs and loading conditions on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a finite element analysis.
    Zeng B; Luo B; Hu J; Meng D; Zhang J; Cao X; Jiang Q
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):657. PubMed ID: 38840138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with novel endocrown system: 3D Finite Element and Weibull analyses.
    Shams A; Sakrana AA; Abo El-Farag SA; Elerian FA; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104853. PubMed ID: 34600429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns].
    Jiang YS; Feng L; Gao XJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Aug; 53(4):764-769. PubMed ID: 34393242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of ceramic materials and tooth preparation design on computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing endocrown adaptation and retentive strength: An in vitro study.
    Farghal A; Dewedar K; AbdElaziz MH; Saker S; Hassona M; Algabri R; Alqutaibi AY
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Feb; 10(1):e843. PubMed ID: 38345492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of fiber insertion and different material type on stress distribution in endocrown restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Yildirim G; Demir C; Güven MÇ; Koç O; Dalkiliç EE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Oct; 25(13):1509-1519. PubMed ID: 34964689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.