203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37978238)
1. Mock community experiments can inform on the reliability of eDNA metabarcoding data: a case study on marine phytoplankton.
Marinchel N; Marchesini A; Nardi D; Girardi M; Casabianca S; Vernesi C; Penna A
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20164. PubMed ID: 37978238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Precision of eDNA Metabarcoding Technology for Biodiversity Monitoring of Eukaryotic Phytoplankton in Lakes].
Zhang LJ; Xu S; Zhao Z; Zhou XH; Feng Q; Yang JH; Li FL; Wang ZH; Zhang XW
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2021 Feb; 42(2):796-807. PubMed ID: 33742874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
Miya M
Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals the effect of environmental selection on phytoplankton community structure along a subtropical river.
Zeng L; Wen J; Huang B; Yang Y; Huang Z; Zeng F; Fang H; Du H
Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 243():117708. PubMed ID: 37993044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental RNA as a Tool for Marine Community Biodiversity Assessments.
Giroux MS; Reichman JR; Langknecht T; Burgess RM; Ho KT
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17782. PubMed ID: 36273070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR.
Pont D; Meulenbroek P; Bammer V; Dejean T; Erős T; Jean P; Lenhardt M; Nagel C; Pekarik L; Schabuss M; Stoeckle BC; Stoica E; Zornig H; Weigand A; Valentini A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 36151931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biodiversity exploration of Formosa Ridge cold seep in the South China Sea using an eDNA metabarcoding approach.
Diao C; Wang M; Zhong Z; Li Y; Xian W; Zhang H
Mar Environ Res; 2023 Sep; 190():106109. PubMed ID: 37506653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative environmental RNA and DNA metabarcoding analysis of river algae and arthropods for ecological surveys and water quality assessment.
Miyata K; Inoue Y; Amano Y; Nishioka T; Nagaike T; Kawaguchi T; Morita O; Yamane M; Honda H
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19828. PubMed ID: 36400924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring of multiple fish species by quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys over two summer seasons.
Wu L; Osugi T; Inagawa T; Okitsu J; Sakamoto S; Minamoto T
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13875. PubMed ID: 37830396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring.
Jeunen GJ; Cane JS; Ferreira S; Strano F; von Ammon U; Cross H; Day R; Hesseltine S; Ellis K; Urban L; Pearson N; Olmedo-Rojas P; Kardailsky A; Gemmell NJ; Lamare M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 36598115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas.
Gold Z; Sprague J; Kushner DJ; Zerecero Marin E; Barber PH
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0238557. PubMed ID: 33626067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plant-derived environmental DNA complements diversity estimates from traditional arthropod monitoring methods but outperforms them detecting plant-arthropod interactions.
Weber S; Stothut M; Mahla L; Kripp A; Hirschler L; Lenz N; Junker A; Künzel S; Krehenwinkel H
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Feb; 24(2):e13900. PubMed ID: 38010630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unveiling invasive insect threats to plant biodiversity: Leveraging eDNA metabarcoding and saturated salt trap solutions for biosurveillance.
Milián-García Y; Pyne C; Lindsay K; Romero A; Hanner RH
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290036. PubMed ID: 37566591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment.
Keck F; Blackman RC; Bossart R; Brantschen J; Couton M; Hürlemann S; Kirschner D; Locher N; Zhang H; Altermatt F
Mol Ecol; 2022 Mar; 31(6):1820-1835. PubMed ID: 35075700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
