These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37979199)

  • 41. Evaluating ChatGPT-4.0's data analytic proficiency in epidemiological studies: A comparative analysis with SAS, SPSS, and R.
    Huang Y; Wu R; He J; Xiang Y
    J Glob Health; 2024 Mar; 14():04070. PubMed ID: 38547497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Large-Scale assessment of ChatGPT's performance in benign and malignant bone tumors imaging report diagnosis and its potential for clinical applications.
    Yang F; Yan D; Wang Z
    J Bone Oncol; 2024 Feb; 44():100525. PubMed ID: 38314324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluating The Role of ChatGPT as a Study Aid in Medical Education in Surgery.
    Araji T; Brooks AD
    J Surg Educ; 2024 May; 81(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 38556438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Readability and Health Literacy Scores for ChatGPT-Generated Dermatology Public Education Materials: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sunscreen and Melanoma Questions.
    Roster K; Kann RB; Farabi B; Gronbeck C; Brownstone N; Lipner SR
    JMIR Dermatol; 2024 Mar; 7():e50163. PubMed ID: 38446502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Artificial intelligence-derived dermatology case reports are indistinguishable from those written by humans: A single-blinded observer study.
    Dunn C; Hunter J; Steffes W; Whitney Z; Foss M; Mammino J; Leavitt A; Hawkins SD; Dane A; Yungmann M; Nathoo R
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Aug; 89(2):388-390. PubMed ID: 37054810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the nai;ve theory of rational action.
    Gergely G; Csibra G
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2003 Jul; 7(7):287-292. PubMed ID: 12860186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. ChatGPT Versus Medical Professionals: Comment.
    Daungsupawong H; Wiwanitkit V
    Health Serv Insights; 2024; 17():11786329241241904. PubMed ID: 38550977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Artificial Intelligence/ChatGPT-Generated Manuscripts and Disclosure: Comment.
    Kleebayoon A; Wiwanitkit V
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2023 Dec; 45(12):102192. PubMed ID: 38049285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. CLP-Related Information for Patients Provided by ChatGPT: Comment.
    Daungsupawong H; Wiwanitkit V
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Jan; ():10556656241229275. PubMed ID: 38295336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relevance of medical information obtained from ChatGPT: Comment.
    Wiwanitkit V
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2023 Dec; 116(12):602. PubMed ID: 37838575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stance and strategy: post-structural perspective and post-colonial engagement to develop nursing knowledge.
    Sochan AM
    Nurs Philos; 2011 Jul; 12(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 21668617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Experts' moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study.
    de Graeff N; Jongsma KR; Bredenoord AL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):25. PubMed ID: 33685438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do we have a moral obligation to synthesize organisms to increase biodiversity? On kinship, awe, and the value of life's diversity.
    Boldt J
    Bioethics; 2013 Oct; 27(8):411-8. PubMed ID: 24010852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. ChatGPT risk of fabrication in literature searches. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2023; 131: e29-e30.
    Arrivé L; Minssen L; Ali A
    Br J Anaesth; 2023 Nov; 131(5):e172-e173. PubMed ID: 37625909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Triggering the intentional stance.
    Mar RA; Macrae CN
    Novartis Found Symp; 2007; 278():111-20; discussion 120-33, 216-21. PubMed ID: 17214313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Experimenting with ChatGPT: Concerns for academic medicine.
    Hirani R; Farabi B; Marmon S
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Sep; 89(3):e127-e129. PubMed ID: 37179029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Consulting ChatGPT: Ethical dilemmas in language model artificial intelligence.
    Beltrami EJ; Grant-Kels JM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2024 Apr; 90(4):879-880. PubMed ID: 36907556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comment on Sallam, M. ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns.
    Moreno E; Alvarez-Lozada LA; Arrambide-Garza FJ; Quiroga-Garza A; Elizondo-Omaña RE
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Oct; 11(21):. PubMed ID: 37957964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessing the diagnostic capability of ChatGPT through clinical case scenarios in dermatology.
    Manoharan P; Surapaneni KM
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2024 May; ():1-3. PubMed ID: 38841923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Response to Young et al., "The utility of ChatGPT in generating patient-facing and clinical responses for melanoma".
    Timurkaynak Ö; Gönenli G
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2024 May; 90(5):e177. PubMed ID: 38215796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.