124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37979480)
1. A 3D physical model predicting favorable bacteria adhesion.
do Nascimento RM; Grauby-Heywang C; Kahli H; Debez N; Béven L; Bechtold IH; Bouhacina TC
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2024 Jan; 233():113628. PubMed ID: 37979480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physico-chemistry of bacterial transmission versus adhesion.
Gusnaniar N; van der Mei HC; Qu W; Nuryastuti T; Hooymans JMM; Sjollema J; Busscher HJ
Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2017 Dec; 250():15-24. PubMed ID: 29129313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms to glass, stainless steel and cellulose.
Wan Dagang WR; Bowen J; O'Keeffe J; Robbins PT; Zhang Z
Biotechnol Lett; 2016 May; 38(5):787-92. PubMed ID: 26892223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Have flagella a preferred orientation during early stages of biofilm formation?: AFM study using patterned substrates.
Díaz C; Schilardi PL; Salvarezza RC; Fernández Lorenzo de Mele M
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2011 Feb; 82(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 21115280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nano/microscale order affects the early stages of biofilm formation on metal surfaces.
Díaz C; Schilardi PL; Salvarezza RC; de Mele MF
Langmuir; 2007 Oct; 23(22):11206-10. PubMed ID: 17880247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of surface sub-micropattern on the adhesion of pioneer bacteria on metals.
Díaz C; Schilardi P; de Mele MF
Artif Organs; 2008 Apr; 32(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 18370943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation by dual functional textured and nitric oxide releasing surfaces.
Xu LC; Wo Y; Meyerhoff ME; Siedlecki CA
Acta Biomater; 2017 Mar; 51():53-65. PubMed ID: 28087484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glucosyltransferase-modulated Streptococcus mutans adhesion to different surfaces involved in biofilm formation by atomic force microscopy.
Wang R; Wang Y; Lei Z; Hao L; Jiang L
Microbiol Immunol; 2022 Nov; 66(11):493-500. PubMed ID: 36047500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atomic force microscopy in biofilm study.
Chatterjee S; Biswas N; Datta A; Dey R; Maiti P
Microscopy (Oxf); 2014 Aug; 63(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 24793174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of culture conditions on Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilm formation by atomic force microscopy.
Oh YJ; Jo W; Yang Y; Park S
Ultramicroscopy; 2007 Oct; 107(10-11):869-74. PubMed ID: 17544218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-molecule analysis of Pseudomonas fluorescens footprints.
El-Kirat-Chatel S; Boyd CD; O'Toole GA; Dufrêne YF
ACS Nano; 2014 Feb; 8(2):1690-8. PubMed ID: 24456070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative characterization of the influence of the nanoscale morphology of nanostructured surfaces on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation.
Singh AV; Vyas V; Patil R; Sharma V; Scopelliti PE; Bongiorno G; Podestà A; Lenardi C; Gade WN; Milani P
PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e25029. PubMed ID: 21966403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nanoscale investigation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formed on porous silicon using atomic force microscopy.
Kannan A; Karumanchi SL; Krishna V; Thiruvengadam K; Ramalingam S; Gautam P
Scanning; 2014; 36(5):551-3. PubMed ID: 25042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emergent Properties in Streptococcus mutans Biofilms Are Controlled through Adhesion Force Sensing by Initial Colonizers.
Wang C; Hou J; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Ren Y
mBio; 2019 Sep; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 31506311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atomic force microscopy studies of bioprocess engineering surfaces - imaging, interactions and mechanical properties mediating bacterial adhesion.
James SA; Hilal N; Wright CJ
Biotechnol J; 2017 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 28488793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spring constants and adhesive properties of native bacterial biofilm cells measured by atomic force microscopy.
Volle CB; Ferguson MA; Aidala KE; Spain EM; Núñez ME
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2008 Nov; 67(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 18815013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antagonism between Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens in planktonic systems and in biofilms.
Simões M; Simoes LC; Pereira MO; Vieira MJ
Biofouling; 2008; 24(5):339-49. PubMed ID: 18576180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In situ and real time investigation of the evolution of a Pseudomonas fluorescens nascent biofilm in the presence of an antimicrobial peptide.
Quilès F; Saadi S; Francius G; Bacharouche J; Humbert F
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Jan; 1858(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 26525662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Submicron trenches reduce the Pseudomonas fluorescens colonization rate on solid surfaces.
Díaz C; Schilardi PL; dos Santos Claro PC; Salvarezza RC; Fernández Lorenzo de Mele MA
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2009 Jan; 1(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 20355765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interaction of bacterial cells with cluster-assembled nanostructured titania surfaces: an atomic force microscopy study.
Singh AV; Galluzzi M; Borghi F; Indrieri M; Vyas V; Podestà A; Gade WN
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23646700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]