These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37979823)

  • 1. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
    Aviram A; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E; Yoon EW; Melamed N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 231(1):124.e1-124.e11. PubMed ID: 37979823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors of unsuccessful vaginal twin delivery.
    Ylilehto E; Palomäki O; Huhtala H; Uotila J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1504-1510. PubMed ID: 32415979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of birthweight and risk of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
    Shulman Y; Shah BR; Berger H; Yoon EW; Helpaerin I; Mei-Dan E; Aviram A; Retnakaran R; Melamed N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101042. PubMed ID: 37286100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting primary cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Ramos SZ; Lewkowitz AK; Lord MG; Has P; Danilack VA; Savitz DA; Werner EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 229(5):549.e1-549.e16. PubMed ID: 37290567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal presentation and successful twin vaginal delivery.
    Easter SR; Lieberman E; Carusi D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):116.e1-116.e10. PubMed ID: 26292044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in patients who undergo vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Luchristt D; Brown O; Pidaparti M; Kenton K; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Miller ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):173.e1-173.e8. PubMed ID: 33617798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study.
    Dougan C; Gotha L; Melamed N; Aviram A; Asztalos EV; Anabusi S; Willan AR; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):702. PubMed ID: 33203367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning.
    Lipschuetz M; Guedalia J; Rottenstreich A; Novoselsky Persky M; Cohen SM; Kabiri D; Levin G; Yagel S; Unger R; Sompolinsky Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):613.e1-613.e12. PubMed ID: 32007491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
    Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for Cesarean delivery in pregnancy with small-for-gestational-age fetus undergoing induction of labor.
    Nwabuobi C; Gowda N; Schmitz J; Wood N; Pargas A; Bagiardi L; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Kuznicki M; Sinkey R; Odibo A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 31441151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrapartum influences on cesarean delivery in multiple gestation.
    Williams KP; Galerneau F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Mar; 82(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 12694120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity.
    Grobman WA; Sandoval G; Rice MM; Bailit JL; Chauhan SP; Costantine MM; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Metz TD; Parry S; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Simhan HN; Thorp JM; Tita ATN; Longo M; Landon MB;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 225(6):664.e1-664.e7. PubMed ID: 34043983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
    Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Factors Associated With Presentation Change of the Second Twin After Vaginal Delivery of the First Twin.
    Panelli DM; Easter SR; Bibbo C; Robinson JN; Carusi DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1104-1111. PubMed ID: 29016498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Induction of Labor in Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
    Beninati MJ; Ramos SZ; Danilack VA; Has P; Savitz DA; Werner EF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):402-410. PubMed ID: 32649502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: an internally validated prediction model.
    Kalafat E; Morales-Rosello J; Thilaganathan B; Tahera F; Khalil A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):134.e1-134.e8. PubMed ID: 29111145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The worst of both worlds-combined deliveries in twin gestations: a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study.
    Aviram A; Lipworth H; Asztalos EV; Mei-Dan E; Cao X; Melamed N; Zaltz A; Anastasio HB; Berghella V; Barrett JFR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):353.e1-353.e7. PubMed ID: 31254526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trial of labour in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.
    de Castro H; Haas J; Schiff E; Sivan E; Yinon Y; Barzilay E
    BJOG; 2016 May; 123(6):940-5. PubMed ID: 26228895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study.
    Aviram A; Lipworth H; Asztalos EV; Mei-Dan E; Melamed N; Cao X; Zaltz A; Hvidman L; Barrett JFR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):916.e1-916.e9. PubMed ID: 32592694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor.
    Brunelli E; Youssef A; Soliman EM; Del Prete B; Mahmoud MH; Fikry M; Pilu G; Kamel RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):81.e1-81.e9. PubMed ID: 33508312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.