BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37979922)

  • 1. A preliminary evaluation of habituation and dishabituation of operant responding in mice.
    Vitale NL; Lewon M
    Behav Processes; 2023 Nov; 213():104967. PubMed ID: 37979922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus specificity and dishabituation of operant responding in humans.
    Kenzer AL; Ghezzi PM; Fuller T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Jul; 100(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 23633179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous recovery and dishabituation of ethanol-reinforced responding in alcohol-preferring rats.
    Murphy ES; McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; McDonald J; Wiediger RV
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Nov; 14(4):471-82. PubMed ID: 17115875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extinguished operant responding shows stimulus specificity.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 Mar; 65(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 14998658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitization and habituation regulate reinforcer effectiveness.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2009 Sep; 92(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 18674628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary Evaluations of Habituation of Operant Responding for Sensory Stimuli in Humans.
    Tonkin SS; Hawk LW
    Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104159. PubMed ID: 32504763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Habituation and the reinforcing effectiveness of visual stimuli.
    Lloyd DR; Gancarz AM; Ashrafioun L; Kausch MA; Richards JB
    Behav Processes; 2012 Oct; 91(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 22868172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decreased environmental complexity during development impairs habituation of reinforcer effectiveness of sensory stimuli.
    Wang R; Hausknecht KA; Haj-Dahmane S; Shen RY; Richards JB
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 337():53-60. PubMed ID: 28943426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nicotine and methamphetamine disrupt habituation of sensory reinforcer effectiveness in male rats.
    Lloyd DR; Hausknecht KA; Richards JB
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2014 Apr; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 24708147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tobacco smoking may delay habituation of reinforcer effectiveness in humans.
    Karelitz JL; Perkins KA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Aug; 235(8):2315-2321. PubMed ID: 29777289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Habituation as an underlying mechanism for Sensory Specific Satiety: An assessment using flavor consumption and preference in rats.
    González A; Sánchez J; de Brugada I
    Appetite; 2022 Feb; 169():105821. PubMed ID: 34808273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different mechanisms are responsible for dishabituation of electrophysiological auditory responses to a change in acoustic identity than to a change in stimulus location.
    Smulders TV; Jarvis ED
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2013 Nov; 106():163-76. PubMed ID: 23999220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance to change varies inversely with reinforcement context.
    Grace RC; Arantes J; Berg ME
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22503966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early extinction effects following intermittent reinforcement: Little evidence of extinction bursts.
    Lattal KA; Kuroda T; Cook JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jul; 114(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 32639050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prenatal ethanol exposure impairs sensory processing and habituation to visual stimuli, effects normalized by enrichment of postnatal environmental.
    Wang R; Martin CD; Lei AL; Hausknecht KA; Turk M; Micov V; Kwarteng F; Ishiwari K; Oubraim S; Wang AL; Richards JB; Haj-Dahmane S; Shen RY
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2022 May; 46(5):891-906. PubMed ID: 35347730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reinforcer satiation and resistance to change of responding maintained by qualitatively different reinforcers.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 19111914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding.
    McSweeney FK; Swindell S; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 15281391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral momentum and relapse of extinguished operant responding.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Learn Behav; 2009 Nov; 37(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 19815932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.