BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37980285)

  • 1. History of proximal femur fractures in the German literature.
    Bartoníček J; Rammelt S; Naňka O
    Int Orthop; 2024 Apr; 48(4):1113-1121. PubMed ID: 37980285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total hip arthroplasty after failed treatment of proximal femur fracture.
    Tetsunaga T; Fujiwara K; Endo H; Noda T; Tetsunaga T; Sato T; Shiota N; Ozaki T
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 28116505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between site-specific bone mineral density in the proximal femur and instability of proximal femoral fractures: A retrospective study.
    Kanazawa T; Ohmori T; Toda K; Ito Y
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 109(5):103496. PubMed ID: 36460291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation Vs. Proximal Femur Nail For Unstable Per-Trochanteric Fractures: A Comparative Analysis Of Outcomes And Complications.
    Memon K; Siddiqui AM; Khan ZA; Zahoor A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 33774951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The history of internal fixation of proximal femur fractures Ernst Pohl-the genius behind.
    Bartoníček J; Rammelt S
    Int Orthop; 2014 Nov; 38(11):2421-6. PubMed ID: 24687268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of shortening in operatively treated proximal femur fractures with cephalomedullary nails with dynamically versus statistically locked helical blades.
    Cherian N; Oladeji L; Ohnoutka C; Touhey D; Sauer M; Schweser KA; Kfuri M; Cook JL; Rocca GJD; Crist BD
    Injury; 2023 Feb; 54(2):669-676. PubMed ID: 36539309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Complications of dynamic hip screw treatment for proximal femoral fractures].
    Hrubina M; Skoták M; Běhounek J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Oct; 77(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 21040651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of proximal femoral nail (PFN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) for the treatment of AO type A2 and A3 pertrochanteric fractures of femur.
    Adeel K; Nadeem RD; Akhtar M; Sah RK; Mohy-Ud-Din I
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 May; 70(5):815-819. PubMed ID: 32400733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Queally JM; Harris E; Handoll HH; Parker MJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; 2014(9):CD004961. PubMed ID: 25212485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.
    Zeng X; Zhan K; Zhang L; Zeng D; Yu W; Zhang X; Zhao M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):38. PubMed ID: 28122548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hardware removal rates after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures : Nationwide trends in Finland in 1997-2016.
    Ponkilainen VT; Huttunen TT; Kannus P; Mattila VM
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Aug; 140(8):1047-1054. PubMed ID: 31965281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical study of the application of compression screw nails in the cross-inverted triangular pattern for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures.
    Wang M; Wang Y; Zou F; Tan L; Wang Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May; 24(1):350. PubMed ID: 37147608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The stability of fixation of proximal femoral fractures: a radiostereometric analysis.
    van Embden D; Stollenwerck GA; Koster LA; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RG; Schipper IB
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 25737524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proximal femur geometry: a major predictor of proximal femur fracture subtypes.
    Senra AR; Carvalho DR; da Silva MR; Sousa AN; Torres J
    Hip Int; 2023 Nov; 33(6):1100-1106. PubMed ID: 36253960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.