These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37980932)

  • 1. Magnetic flux leakage defect size estimation method based on physics-informed neural network.
    Xiong Y; Liu S; Hou L; Zhou T
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2024 Jan; 382(2264):20220387. PubMed ID: 37980932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Review of Magnetic Flux Leakage Nondestructive Testing.
    Feng B; Wu J; Tu H; Tang J; Kang Y
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Oct; 15(20):. PubMed ID: 36295427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention Module Magnetic Flux Leakage Linked Deep Residual Network for Pipeline In-Line Inspection.
    Liu S; Wang H; Li R
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic Flux Leakage Sensing and Artificial Neural Network Pattern Recognition-Based Automated Damage Detection and Quantification for Wire Rope Non-Destructive Evaluation.
    Kim JW; Park S
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29301294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defect Width Assessment Based on the Near-Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Method.
    Li E; Chen Y; Chen X; Wu J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wire Rope Defect Recognition Method Based on MFL Signal Analysis and 1D-CNNs.
    Liu S; Chen M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative Study on MFL Signal of Pipeline Composite Defect Based on Improved Magnetic Charge Model.
    Liu B; Luo N; Feng G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34068412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification method of tubing defects based on machine learning algorithm and magnetic flux leakage signals.
    Shi M; Ni M; Qin L; Liang Y; Huang Z
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2023 Jan; 94(1):015111. PubMed ID: 36725586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Online MFL Sensing Method for Steel Pipe Based on the Magnetic Guiding Effect.
    Wu J; Fang H; Huang X; Xia H; Kang Y; Tang C
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 29244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theory and Application of Magnetic Flux Leakage Pipeline Detection.
    Shi Y; Zhang C; Li R; Cai M; Jia G
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 15(12):31036-55. PubMed ID: 26690435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Lift-Off-Tolerant Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing Method for Drill Pipes at Wellhead.
    Wu J; Fang H; Li L; Wang J; Huang X; Kang Y; Sun Y; Tang C
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 28117721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Size of a Defect in Reinforcing Steel Using Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Measurements.
    Yousaf J; Harseno RW; Kee SH; Yee JJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defect driven physics-informed neural network framework for fatigue life prediction of additively manufactured materials.
    Wang L; Zhu SP; Luo C; Niu X; He JC
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2023 Nov; 381(2260):20220386. PubMed ID: 37742712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast estimation of defect profiles from the magnetic flux leakage signal based on a multi-power affine projection algorithm.
    Han W; Shen X; Xu J; Wang P; Tian G; Wu Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Sep; 14(9):16454-66. PubMed ID: 25192314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fusion PCAM R-CNN of Automatic Segmentation for Magnetic Flux Leakage Defects.
    Wang Z; Yang L; Sun T; Yan W
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2024 Aug; 35(8):11424-11435. PubMed ID: 37027265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface and back-side defects identification combined with magnetic flux leakage and boundary magnetic perturbation.
    Ou Z; Han Z; Yang C; Dong S; Du D
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2022 Jun; 93(6):065006. PubMed ID: 35778000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Signal Characteristics of Oil and Gas Pipeline Leakage Detection Based on Magneto-Mechanical Effects.
    Liu B; Ge Q; Wu Z; Lian Z; Yang L; Geng H
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image Registration for Visualizing Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing under Different Orientations of Magnetization.
    Li S; Zhang J; Liu G; Chen N; Tian L; Bai L; Chen C
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jan; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanism of Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection Method Based on the Slotted Ferromagnetic Lift-Off Layer.
    Tang J; Wang R; Qiu G; Hu Y; Kang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remaining useful lifetime estimation for discrete power electronic devices using physics-informed neural network.
    Lu Z; Guo C; Liu M; Shi R
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10167. PubMed ID: 37349382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.