These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3798118)

  • 21. Random audit of papers proposed.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1988 Nov; 242(4879):657-8. PubMed ID: 3187510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stanford inquiry casts doubt on 11 papers.
    Norman C
    Science; 1988 Nov; 242(4879):659-61. PubMed ID: 3187512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigator labeled fraud has last published word: 'I'm sorry.
    Med World News; 1983 Jun; 24(12):40-1. PubMed ID: 11645491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Battle over error.
    Stewart WW; Feder N
    Science; 1988 Oct; 242(4876):167-8. PubMed ID: 3175639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New ways of shading truth.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1985 Jun 6-12; 315(6019):447. PubMed ID: 4000272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scientists get mad at OSI. Richards Panel: out of the loop?
    Palca J
    Science; 1991 Jun; 252(5013):1606-7. PubMed ID: 2047866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Imanishi-Kari affair. Baltimore declares O'Toole mistaken.
    Baltimore D
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6325):341-3. PubMed ID: 2034280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4966):240-2. PubMed ID: 2374923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Science needs vigilance not vigilantes.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1939-40. PubMed ID: 3418857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].
    Bonnet F; Samama CM
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fraud in science.
    Altman L; Melcher L
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jun; 286(6383):2003-6. PubMed ID: 6409204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How charges of lab fraud grew into a cause célèbre.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():C1, C5. PubMed ID: 11646839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An end to fraud?
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two critics of science revel in the role.
    Boffey PM
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Apr; ():C1. PubMed ID: 11646670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
    Friedly J
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conduct unbecoming?
    Weiss P
    N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.