These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37981804)

  • 1. Comparison of different 3D printers in terms of dimensional stability by image data of a dry human mandible obtained from CBCT and CT.
    Peker Ozturk H; Ayyıldız S
    Int J Artif Organs; 2024 Jan; 47(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 37981804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
    de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of three-dimensional, paper-based models generated using a low-cost, three-dimensional printer.
    Olszewski R; Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1847-52. PubMed ID: 25176496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trueness of cone-beam computed tomography-derived skull models fabricated by different technology-based three-dimensional printers.
    Wang X; Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Ferraris E; Jacobs R
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):397. PubMed ID: 37328901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology.
    Msallem B; Sharma N; Cao S; Halbeisen FS; Zeilhofer HF; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32192099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a "Low-Cost" 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer.
    Maschio F; Pandya M; Olszewski R
    Med Sci Monit; 2016 Mar; 22():943-57. PubMed ID: 27003456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) generated tooth replicas with application in autotransplantation.
    Lee CKJ; Foong KWC; Sim YF; Chew MT
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103908. PubMed ID: 34856326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
    Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study.
    Rebong RE; Stewart KT; Utreja A; Ghoneima AA
    Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 29509023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Rangel FA; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Becking AG; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 20640463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing of Different Scanning Protocols Used for Precise 3D-printing of Mandibular Models.
    Micic M; Jadzic J; Milenkovic P; Antic S; Antonijevic D; Djuric M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 34(7):e623-e626. PubMed ID: 37226292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography-derived casts: A comparative study.
    Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Novillo F; Politis C; Jacobs R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 32044107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT.
    Loubele M; Guerrero ME; Jacobs R; Suetens P; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):446-54. PubMed ID: 17622012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear measurement accuracy of CBCT panoramic reconstructions: experimental study with dry human mandibles.
    Almeida VSM; Bomfim RT; Sobreira ACR; Barbosa IDS; Leite-Ribeiro PM; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32936399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional error of three-dimensional images generated by different software.
    Pimentel PA; Bomfim RT; Andrade LC; Ferraz EG; Ribeiro Lamberti PL; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(8):480-4. PubMed ID: 26200519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Han SS; Lee KM; Kim KD
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():808625. PubMed ID: 26579540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-derived virtual 3-dimensional bone surface models of the mandible in comparison to computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: A porcine cadaver study.
    Probst FA; Burian E; Malenova Y; Lyutskanova P; Stumbaum MJ; Ritschl LM; Kronthaler S; Karampinos D; Probst M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 23(5):779-788. PubMed ID: 34318580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
    Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.