These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37982748)

  • 1. CENTRE: a gradient boosting algorithm for Cell-type-specific ENhancer-Target pREdiction.
    Rapakoulia T; Lopez Ruiz De Vargas S; Omgba PA; Laupert V; Ulitsky I; Vingron M
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 39(11):. PubMed ID: 37982748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating distal and proximal information to predict gene expression via a densely connected convolutional neural network.
    Zeng W; Wang Y; Jiang R
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 36(2):496-503. PubMed ID: 31318408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancer-MDLF: a novel deep learning framework for identifying cell-specific enhancers.
    Zhang Y; Zhang P; Wu H
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 38485768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opening up the blackbox: an interpretable deep neural network-based classifier for cell-type specific enhancer predictions.
    Kim SG; Theera-Ampornpunt N; Fang CH; Harwani M; Grama A; Chaterji S
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):54. PubMed ID: 27490187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved regulatory element prediction based on tissue-specific local epigenomic signatures.
    He Y; Gorkin DU; Dickel DE; Nery JR; Castanon RG; Lee AY; Shen Y; Visel A; Pennacchio LA; Ren B; Ecker JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Feb; 114(9):E1633-E1640. PubMed ID: 28193886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring time series chromatin states for promoter-enhancer pairs based on Hi-C data.
    Miko H; Qiu Y; Gaertner B; Sander M; Ohler U
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):84. PubMed ID: 33509077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploiting sequence-based features for predicting enhancer-promoter interactions.
    Yang Y; Zhang R; Singh S; Ma J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(14):i252-i260. PubMed ID: 28881991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A predictive modeling approach for cell line-specific long-range regulatory interactions.
    Roy S; Siahpirani AF; Chasman D; Knaack S; Ay F; Stewart R; Wilson M; Sridharan R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Oct; 43(18):8694-712. PubMed ID: 26338778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local Epigenomic Data are more Informative than Local Genome Sequence Data in Predicting Enhancer-Promoter Interactions Using Neural Networks.
    Xiao M; Zhuang Z; Pan W
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Dec; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31905774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supervised learning of enhancer-promoter specificity based on genome-wide perturbation studies highlights areas for improvement in learning.
    Barth D; Van R; Cardwell J; Han MV
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Jun; 40(6):. PubMed ID: 38870532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancer target prediction: state-of-the-art approaches and future prospects.
    Umarov R; Hon CC
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2023 Oct; 51(5):1975-1988. PubMed ID: 37830459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CD8
    He B; Xing S; Chen C; Gao P; Teng L; Shan Q; Gullicksrud JA; Martin MD; Yu S; Harty JT; Badovinac VP; Tan K; Xue HH
    Immunity; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1341-1354. PubMed ID: 27986453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EpiCompare: an online tool to define and explore genomic regions with tissue or cell type-specific epigenomic features.
    He Y; Wang T
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 33(20):3268-3275. PubMed ID: 28605501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational schemes for the prediction and annotation of enhancers from epigenomic assays.
    Whitaker JW; Nguyen TT; Zhu Y; Wildberg A; Wang W
    Methods; 2015 Jan; 72():86-94. PubMed ID: 25461775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method for enhancer prediction based on deep belief network.
    Bu H; Gan Y; Wang Y; Zhou S; Guan J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(Suppl 12):418. PubMed ID: 29072144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EAGLE: An algorithm that utilizes a small number of genomic features to predict tissue/cell type-specific enhancer-gene interactions.
    Gao T; Qian J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Oct; 15(10):e1007436. PubMed ID: 31665135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DeepITEH: a deep learning framework for identifying tissue-specific eRNAs from the human genome.
    Zhang T; Li L; Sun H; Wang G
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jun; 39(6):. PubMed ID: 37294799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Esearch3D: propagating gene expression in chromatin networks to illuminate active enhancers.
    Heer M; Giudice L; Mengoni C; Giugno R; Rico D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jun; 51(10):e55. PubMed ID: 37021559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative prediction of enhancer-promoter interactions.
    Belokopytova PS; Nuriddinov MA; Mozheiko EA; Fishman D; Fishman V
    Genome Res; 2020 Jan; 30(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 31804952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HEAP: a task adaptive-based explainable deep learning framework for enhancer activity prediction.
    Liu Y; Wang Z; Yuan H; Zhu G; Zhang Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 37539835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.