These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Is there still a place for surgery in the treatment of ureteral stones? Kirkali Z; Mungan MU; Arslan G; Sahin O Acta Urol Belg; 1997 Oct; 65(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 9421935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for upper urinary tract stones using the Dornier lithotriptor MFL5000]. Fujimoto N; Kyo M; Ichikawa Y; Nagano S Hinyokika Kiyo; 1994 Dec; 40(12):1069-75. PubMed ID: 7863858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Drago JR; Nesbitt JA; Shah BN; Nelson JH; Wise HA Int Surg; 1987; 72(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 3596979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Utility of ureteral stent for stone street after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy]. Kato Y; Yamaguchi S; Hori J; Okuyama M; Kaneko S; Yachiku S Hinyokika Kiyo; 2005 May; 51(5):309-14; dicussion 314. PubMed ID: 15977596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases]. Halachmi S; Goldin O; Gleizarov E; Kaufman Z; Ginesin Y; Meretyk S Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):605-8, 680, 679. PubMed ID: 16218527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy. Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical experiences of renal and upper ureter stone by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). II: 3-month follow-up of cases treated with ESWL]. Kato S; Tanda H; Ohnishi S; Saka T; Nakajima H Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Aug; 31(8):1317-20. PubMed ID: 4083195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast. Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS]. Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones using a small caliber ureteroscope and a laser lithotriptor. Mugiya S; Nagata M; Un-No T; Takayama T; Suzuki K; Fujita K J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):329-31. PubMed ID: 10893577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]