BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37983115)

  • 1. Rhinoplasty and Le Fort I Maxillary Osteotomy in Cleft Patients.
    Harjunpää R; Grann A; Saarikko A; Heliövaara A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37983115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in soft tissue thickness after Le Fort I osteotomy in different cleft types.
    Heliövaara A; Hukki J; Ranta R; Rintala A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 12387612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the Nostril Shape Change After Le Fort I Advancement in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip?
    Ganske IM; Tan RA; Langa OC; Calabrese CE; Padwa BL
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 78(6):998-1005. PubMed ID: 32057693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft patients: Maxillary advancement and velopharyngeal function.
    Harjunpää R; Alaluusua S; Leikola J; Heliövaara A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 47(12):1868-1874. PubMed ID: 31812310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical Modifications Specific to the Cleft Le Fort I Osteotomy.
    Susarla SM; Ettinger R; Preston K; Hitesh Kapadia ; Egbert MA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(5):1459-1463. PubMed ID: 32282690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blindness as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary distraction.
    Lo LJ; Hung KF; Chen YR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Feb; 109(2):688-98; discussion 699-700. PubMed ID: 11818854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of maxillary advancement on articulation of alveolar consonants in cleft patients.
    Alaluusua S; Harjunpää R; Turunen L; Geneid A; Leikola J; Heliövaara A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 May; 48(5):472-476. PubMed ID: 32156496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.
    Kloukos D; Fudalej P; Sequeira-Byron P; Katsaros C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD010403. PubMed ID: 30095853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Velopharyngeal Configuration Changes Following Le Fort I Osteotomy With Maxillary Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cephalometric Study.
    Wu Y; Wang X; Ma L; Li Z
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 25259778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Transpalatal modified Le Fort I osteotomy for correction of maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate patients: a preliminary clinical application].
    Wu Y; Li ZL; Wang X; Yi B; Ma L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Jun; 48(3):550-4. PubMed ID: 27318923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous options for cleft secondary deformities.
    Scopelliti D; Fatone FM; Cipriani O; Papi P
    Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 3(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 24205478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients? A systematic review.
    Velasques BD; Moura LB; Martins JR; Damian MF; Xavier CB
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 25(2):139-148. PubMed ID: 32940776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric pharyngeal changes after Le Fort I osteotomy in different types of clefts.
    Heliövaara A; Hukki J; Ranta R; Haapanen ML
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2004; 38(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 15074716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Change in Lower Lip Position After Le Fort I Advancement in Patients with Bilateral vs. Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Schechter J; Alcon A; Verzella A; Shetye P; Flores R
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2023 Jun; ():10556656231184975. PubMed ID: 38836361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.
    Kloukos D; Fudalej P; Sequeira-Byron P; Katsaros C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 9(9):CD010403. PubMed ID: 27689965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Horizontal Maxillary Osteotomy Stability Using Mandibular Outer Cortex Bone Grafts in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Zheng Y; Yin N; Jiang C; Song T
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 29(7):1747-1750. PubMed ID: 30028400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation Between Speech Outcomes and the Amount of Maxillary Advancement After Orthognathic Surgery (Le Fort I Conventional Osteotomy and Distraction Osteogenesis) in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Chung J; Lim J; Park H; Yoo A; Kim S; Koo Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 30(6):1855-1858. PubMed ID: 31107383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is Linear Advancement Related to Relapse in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Orthognathic Surgery?
    Watts GD; Antonarakis GS; Forrest CR; Tompson BD; Phillips JH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):717-23. PubMed ID: 25259777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extent of maxillary deficiency in patients with complete UCLP and BCLP.
    Lisson JA; Weyrich C
    Head Face Med; 2014 Jun; 10():26. PubMed ID: 24951050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Preliminary Three-Dimensional Analysis of Nasal Aesthetics Following Le Fort I Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Davidson E; Kumar AR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):e629-33. PubMed ID: 26468849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.