BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3798490)

  • 1. Contraceptive perceptions and method choice among young single women in the United States.
    Tanfer K; Rosenbaum E
    Stud Fam Plann; 1986; 17(6 Pt 1):269-77. PubMed ID: 3798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of women who stop using contraceptives.
    Hammerslough CR
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 6714376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding U.S. fertility: findings from the National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle III.
    Pratt WF; Mosher WD; Bachrach CA; Horn MC
    Popul Bull; 1984 Dec; 39(5):3-42. PubMed ID: 12266654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995.
    Piccinino LJ; Mosher WD
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(1):4-10, 46. PubMed ID: 9494809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Contraceptive failure in the United States: the impact of social economic and demographic factors (author's transl)].
    Schirm AL; Trussell J; Menken J; Grady WR
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Apr; 11(4):659-73. PubMed ID: 12338614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensions of the contraceptive attributes questionnaire.
    Beckman LJ; Harvey SM; Murray J
    Psychol Women Q; 1992 Jun; 16(2):243-59. PubMed ID: 12344926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contraceptive discontinuation among married women in the United States.
    Grady WR; Hayward MD; Florey FA
    Stud Fam Plann; 1988; 19(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 3176095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contraceptive patterns of religious and racial groups in the United States, 1955-76: convergence and distinctiveness.
    Mosher WD; Goldscheider C
    Stud Fam Plann; 1984; 15(3):101-11. PubMed ID: 6740727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.
    Paul R; Huysman BC; Maddipati R; Madden T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4S):S884.e1-S884.e9. PubMed ID: 31838124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescent contraception.
    Kreutner AK
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 1981 May; 28(2):455-73. PubMed ID: 7243372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes toward condom use and AIDS among patients from an urban family practice center.
    Stewart DL; DeForge BR; Hartmann P; Kaminski M; Pecukonis E
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1991 Sep; 83(9):772-6. PubMed ID: 1942110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's perceptions of the pill's potential health risks in Sri Lanka.
    Thapa S; Salgado M; Fortney JA; Grubb GS; De Silva V
    Asia Pac Popul J; 1987 Sep; 2(3):39-56. PubMed ID: 12268936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adolescent contraception: nonhormonal methods.
    Kulig JW
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 1989 Jun; 36(3):717-30. PubMed ID: 2660093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-availability of the IUD and contraceptive choice.
    Rapkin AJ; Alcalay R; Mitchell J
    Contraception; 1988 Apr; 37(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 3383575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes about condoms and condom use among college students.
    Beckman LJ; Harvey SM; Tiersky LA
    J Am Coll Health; 1996 May; 44(6):243-9. PubMed ID: 8735161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contraceptive use, pregnancy and fertility patterns among single American women in their 20s.
    Tanfer K; Horn MC
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 3979524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraceptive method switching among American female adolescents, 1979.
    Hirsch MB; Zelnik M
    J Adolesc Health Care; 1985 Jan; 6(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3965412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Barriers to condom use and barrier method preferences among low-income African-American women.
    Eldridge GD; St Lawrence JS; Little CE; Shelby MC; Brasfield TL
    Women Health; 1995; 23(1):73-89. PubMed ID: 7483652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995.
    Mosher WD; Bachrach CA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 8822409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Barrier and spermicidal contraceptive methods and risk of invasive cervical cancer.
    Hildesheim A; Brinton LA; Mallin K; Lehman HF; Stolley P; Savitz DA; Levine R
    Epidemiology; 1990 Jul; 1(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 2083303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.