129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37985190)
1. Jawbone measurements of edentulous sites related to implant planning using magnetic resonance imaging compared to cone beam computed tomography: An ex vivo study.
Fuglsig JMCES; Schropp L; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 37985190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alveolar bone measurements in magnetic resonance imaging compared with cone beam computed tomography: a pilot,
Fuglsig JMCES; Hansen B; Schropp L; Nixdorf DR; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Acta Odontol Scand; 2023 Apr; 81(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 36112428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy.
Nunes LS; Bornstein MM; Sendi P; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 23593627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Kılıç C; Yüksel S; Avsever H; Farman A; Scarfe WC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130332. PubMed ID: 24645965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone-beam computed tomography and microtomography for alveolar bone measurements.
Ferrare N; Leite AF; Caracas HC; de Azevedo RB; de Melo NS; de Souza Figueiredo PT
Surg Radiol Anat; 2013 Aug; 35(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 23400642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of cone beam CT volume orientation on alveolar bone measurements in patients with different facial profiles.
Costa ED; Peyneau PD; Ambrosano GMB; Oliveira ML
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Sep; 48(6):20180330. PubMed ID: 30864821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in alveolar bone width around maxillary implants, as determined through cone beam computed tomography based on bony landmarks: A preliminary study.
Lin SW; Hu KF; Lin YC; Liu PF; Chou YH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):861-870. PubMed ID: 37259681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CBCT analysis of crestal soft tissue thickness before implant placement and its relationship with cortical bone thickness.
Cui X; Reason T; Pardi V; Wu Q; Martinez Luna AA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):593. PubMed ID: 36496410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation with different measuring methods for the alveolar bone change of ridge preservation in molar sites].
Zhao LP; Zhan YL; Hu WJ; Xu T; Wei YP; Zhen M; Wang C
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 48(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 26885922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images.
Kurt Bayrakdar S; Orhan K; Bayrakdar IS; Bilgir E; Ezhov M; Gusarev M; Shumilov E
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 34011314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Sun Z; Smith T; Kortam S; Kim DG; Tee BC; Fields H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e117-27. PubMed ID: 21300222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
