These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37985382)

  • 21. The PREgnancy and FERtility (PREFER) study: an Italian multicenter prospective cohort study on fertility preservation and pregnancy issues in young breast cancer patients.
    Lambertini M; Anserini P; Fontana V; Poggio F; Iacono G; Abate A; Levaggi A; Miglietta L; Bighin C; Giraudi S; D'Alonzo A; Blondeaux E; Buffi D; Campone F; Merlo DF; Del Mastro L
    BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):346. PubMed ID: 28526012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Addressing Barriers to Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: The Role of Oncofertility Patient Navigation.
    Dorfman CS; Stalls JM; Mills C; Voelkel S; Thompson M; Acharya KS; Baker KC; Wagner LM; Miller N; Boswell A; Corbett C
    J Oncol Navig Surviv; 2021 Oct; 12(10):332-348. PubMed ID: 34804640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Expanding Urgent Oncofertility Services for Reproductive Age Women Remote from a Tertiary Level Fertility Centre by Use of Telemedicine and an On-site Nurse Navigator.
    Zwingerman R; Melenchuk K; McMahon E; Liu KE; Siren A; Laferriere N; Greenblatt EM
    J Cancer Educ; 2020 Jun; 35(3):515-521. PubMed ID: 30820926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk of recurrence and pregnancy outcomes in young women with breast cancer who do and do not undergo fertility preservation.
    Wang Y; Tesch ME; Lim C; Xu YH; Lee S; Perdizet K; Yokom D; Warner E; Roberts J; Lohrisch CA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Sep; 195(2):201-208. PubMed ID: 35908122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Random start ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation appears unlikely to delay initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    Letourneau JM; Sinha N; Wald K; Harris E; Quinn M; Imbar T; Mok-Lin E; Chien AJ; Rosen M
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2123-2129. PubMed ID: 28938748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.
    Scholl I; Hahlweg P; Lindig A; Frerichs W; Zill J; Cords H; Bokemeyer C; Coym A; Schmalfeldt B; Smeets R; Vollkommer T; Witzel I; Härter M; Kriston L
    Implement Sci; 2021 Dec; 16(1):106. PubMed ID: 34965881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.
    Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Ter Stege JA; Woerdeman LAE; Hahn DEE; van Huizum MA; van Duijnhoven FH; Kieffer JM; Retèl VP; Sherman KA; Witkamp AJ; Oldenburg HSA; Bleiker EMA
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Aug; 19(1):165. PubMed ID: 31426772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist protocols for emergency fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer-a prospective nationwide Swedish multicenter study.
    Marklund A; Eloranta S; Wikander I; Kitlinski ML; Lood M; Nedstrand E; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Zhang P; Bergh J; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):929-938. PubMed ID: 32313940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Priorities in Fertility Decisions for Reproductive-Aged Cancer Patients: Fertility Attitudes and Cancer Treatment Study.
    Flink DM; Kondapalli LA; Kellar-Guenther Y
    J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol; 2017 Sep; 6(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 28221816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trends and Regional Differences for Fertility Preservation Procedures in Women With Breast Cancer.
    Turan V; Bedoschi G; Lee DY; Barbosa CP; de Oliveira R; Sacinti KG; Sonmezer M; Lambertini M; Massarotti C; Schaub A; Wang E; Gayete-Lafuente S; Dunlop C; Anderson RA; Bang H; Oktay KH
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39428290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost talk: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of an intervention helping patients and urologic surgeons discuss costs of care for slow-growing prostate cancer during shared decision-making.
    Politi MC; Forcino RC; Parrish K; Durand MA; O'Malley AJ; Elwyn G
    Trials; 2021 Jun; 22(1):422. PubMed ID: 34187547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors associated with the receipt of fertility preservation services along the decision-making pathway in young Canadian female cancer patients.
    Yee S
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Feb; 33(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 26560157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "Will It Affect Our Chances of Having Children?" and Feeling "Like a Ticking Bomb" -The Fertility Concerns and Fears of Cancer Progression and Recurrence in Cancer Treatment Decision-Making Among Young Women Diagnosed With Gynaecological or Breast Cancer.
    Sobota A; Ozakinci G
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():632162. PubMed ID: 34149518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcomes of delivering a fertility preservation service for women with cancer over a 12-year period at a UK assisted conception unit.
    McDougall S; Vogt KS; Wilkinson A; Skull J; Jones GL
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):252-259. PubMed ID: 31392913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fertility preservation in reproductive-aged female patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review.
    Landay SL; Burns JA; Bickle ML; Baltich Nelson B; Nipp RD
    Support Care Cancer; 2023 Oct; 31(10):612. PubMed ID: 37796328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improving Access to Standardized Fertility Preservation Information for Older Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Using a User-Centered Approach with Young Adult Patients, Survivors, and Partners to Refine Fertility Knowledge Transfer.
    Tam S; Puri N; Stephens D; Mitchell L; Giuliani M; Papadakos J; Gupta AA
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Jun; 33(3):528-535. PubMed ID: 27671919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Observational study of the development and evaluation of a fertility preservation patient decision aid for teenage and adult women diagnosed with cancer: the Cancer, Fertility and Me research protocol.
    Jones GL; Hughes J; Mahmoodi N; Greenfield D; Brauten-Smith G; Skull J; Gath J; Yeomanson D; Baskind E; Snowden JA; Jacques RM; Velikova G; Collins K; Stark D; Phillips R; Lane S; Bekker HL;
    BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e013219. PubMed ID: 28289046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Deciding about fertility preservation after specialist counselling.
    Bastings L; Baysal Ö; Beerendonk CC; IntHout J; Traas MA; Verhaak CM; Braat DD; Nelen WL
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1721-9. PubMed ID: 24916435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. To preserve or not to preserve: how difficult is the decision about fertility preservation?
    Mersereau JE; Goodman LR; Deal AM; Gorman JR; Whitcomb BW; Su HI
    Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):4044-50. PubMed ID: 24037854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.