These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37985597)

  • 21. Missed targets, reaction times, and arousal are related to trait anxiety and attention to pain during an experimental vigilance task with a painful target.
    Emerson NM; Meeker TJ; Greenspan JD; Saffer MI; Campbell CM; Korzeniewska A; Lenz FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Feb; 123(2):462-472. PubMed ID: 31596643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of visual statistical learning in RSVP: Implicit learning or stream location artifact?
    Rawal A; Tseng P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1246-1263. PubMed ID: 33539166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing Visual Statistical Learning in Early-School-Aged Children: The Usefulness of an Online Reaction Time Measure.
    van Witteloostuijn M; Lammertink I; Boersma P; Wijnen F; Rispens J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2051. PubMed ID: 31572261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting moment-to-moment attentional state.
    Rosenberg MD; Finn ES; Constable RT; Chun MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 114():249-56. PubMed ID: 25800207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does animacy affect visual statistical learning? Revisiting the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning.
    Cox JA; Wu Y; Aimola Davies AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; 77(3):492-510. PubMed ID: 37089088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.
    Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual statistical learning based on time information.
    Otsuka S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Feb; 152(2):363-388. PubMed ID: 35980711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sustained and transient attention in the continuous performance task.
    Smid HG; de Witte MR; Homminga I; van den Bosch RJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2006 Aug; 28(6):859-83. PubMed ID: 16822729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implicit learning of predictive relationships in three-element visual sequences by young and old adults.
    Howard JH; Howard DV; Dennis NA; Kelly AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1139-57. PubMed ID: 18763897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual statistical learning can drive object-based attentional selection.
    Zhao L; Cosman JD; Vatterott DB; Gupta P; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2240-8. PubMed ID: 24935806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual statistical learning of shape sequences: an ERP study.
    Abla D; Okanoya K
    Neurosci Res; 2009 Jun; 64(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 19428699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing.
    Higuchi Y; Ueda Y; Ogawa H; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2397-2410. PubMed ID: 27566325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Side effects of being blue: influence of sad mood on visual statistical learning.
    Bertels J; Demoulin C; Franco A; Destrebecqz A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59832. PubMed ID: 23555797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do concerns about COVID-19 impair sustained attention?
    Jun J; Toh YN; Sisk CA; Remington RW; Lee VG
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 May; 6(1):41. PubMed ID: 34046743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differential effects of cue-based and sequence knowledge-based predictability on multitasking performance.
    Gaschler R; Kemper M; Zhao F; Pumpe I; Ruderisch CB; Röttger E; Haider H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():76-86. PubMed ID: 30227313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Won BY; Cistera JD; Rosenbaum GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 25113853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.
    Mayr U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 8901340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical regularities reduce perceived numerosity.
    Zhao J; Yu RQ
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():217-22. PubMed ID: 26451701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.