182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37986051)
21. Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology.
Gong LP; Li XY; Wu YN; Dong S; Zhang S; Feng YN; Lv YE; Guo XJ; Peng YQ; Du XS; Tian JW; Sun CX; Sun LT
J Ovarian Res; 2023 Mar; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 36945000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. O-RADS MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Category-wise Malignancy Rates.
Rizzo S; Cozzi A; Dolciami M; Del Grande F; Scarano AL; Papadia A; Gui B; Gandolfo N; Catalano C; Manganaro L
Radiology; 2023 Apr; 307(1):e220795. PubMed ID: 36413127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective comparative trial comparing O-RADS, IOTA ADNEX model, and RMI score for preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses for prediction of ovarian cancer.
Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 May; 49(5):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 36895122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictive accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS US scoring system among sonologists with different training levels.
Wu M; Zhang M; Cao J; Wu S; Chen Y; Luo L; Lin X; Su M; Zhang X
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 308(2):631-637. PubMed ID: 35994107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Poncelet E; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Guerra A; Fournier LS; Stojanovic S; Millet I; Bharwani N; Juhan V; Cunha TM; Masselli G; Balleyguier C; Malhaire C; Perrot NF; Sadowski EA; Bazot M; Taourel P; Porcher R; Darai E; Reinhold C; Rockall AG
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1919896. PubMed ID: 31977064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.
Pelayo M; Sancho-Sauco J; Sánchez-Zurdo J; Perez-Mies B; Abarca-Martínez L; Cancelo-Hidalgo MJ; Sainz-Bueno JA; Alcázar JL; Pelayo-Delgado I
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.
Chen GY; Hsu TF; Chan IS; Liu CH; Chao WT; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang PH; Chen YJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7854-7864. PubMed ID: 35583711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. O-RADS MRI SCORE: An Essential First-Step Tool for the Characterization of Adnexal Masses.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Dabi Y; Florin M; Saltel-Fulero A; Manganaro L; Bazot M; Razakamanantsoa L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Mar; 59(3):720-736. PubMed ID: 37550825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bridging Communication Gaps Between Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Through Standardized Structured Cancer Imaging Reporting: The Experience with Female Pelvic MRI Assessment Using O-RADS and a Simulated Cohort Patient Group.
Woo S; Andrieu PC; Abu-Rustum NR; Broach V; Zivanovic O; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki E; Ellis A; Carayon P; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1388-1397. PubMed ID: 37661555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better Than Visual Assessment.
Wengert GJ; Dabi Y; Kermarrec E; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Poncelet E; Porcher R; Thomassin-Naggara I; Rockall AG;
Radiology; 2022 Jun; 303(3):566-575. PubMed ID: 35230183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of differences in O-RADS lexicon interpretation between senior and junior sonologists on O-RADS classification and diagnostic performance.
Yang Y; Wang H; Liu Z; Su N; Gao L; Tao X; Zhang R; Gu Y; Ma L; Wang R; Xu W; Xie Y; Zhang W; Zhang H; Xue G; Ru T; Dai Q; Li J; Jiang Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Oct; 149(13):12275-12283. PubMed ID: 37430161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Hottat NA; Badr DA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):158-170. PubMed ID: 34797013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in the Evaluation of Adnexal Masses with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound.
Xu J; Huang Z; Zeng J; Zheng Z; Cao J; Su M; Zhang X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1527-1534. PubMed ID: 37032238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses.
Wang T; Cui W; Nie F; Huang X; Huang L; Liu L; Zhu Y; Zheng R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2072-2080. PubMed ID: 37321953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. American college of radiology ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system ultrasound (O-RADS): Diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement for ovarian masses in children.
Wang H; Wang L; An S; Ma Q; Tu Y; Shang N; Pan Y
Front Pediatr; 2023; 11():1091735. PubMed ID: 36969276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
