115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37987036)
1. Blind prediction of toluene/water partition coefficients using COSMO-RS: results from the SAMPL9 challenge.
Nevolianis T; Ahmed RA; Hellweg A; Diedenhofen M; Leonhard K
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Nov; 25(46):31683-31691. PubMed ID: 37987036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and test of highly accurate endpoint free energy methods. 3: partition coefficient prediction using a Poisson-Boltzmann method combined with a solvent accessible surface area model for SAMPL challenges.
Niu T; He X; Han F; Wang L; Wang J
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Dec; 26(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 38053433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. COSMO-RS predictions of logP in the SAMPL7 blind challenge.
Warnau J; Wichmann K; Reinisch J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):813-818. PubMed ID: 34125358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating multiscale and machine learning approaches towards the SAMPL9 log
Draper MR; Waterman A; Dannatt JE; Patel P
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Feb; 26(9):7907-7919. PubMed ID: 38376855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of toluene/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL9 blind challenge: assessment of machine learning and IEF-PCM/MST continuum solvation models.
Zamora WJ; Viayna A; Pinheiro S; Curutchet C; Bisbal L; Ruiz R; Ràfols C; Luque FJ
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Jul; 25(27):17952-17965. PubMed ID: 37376995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.
Işık M; Bergazin TD; Fox T; Rizzi A; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):335-370. PubMed ID: 32107702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of partition and distribution coefficients in various solvent pairs with COSMO-RS.
Tshepelevitsh S; Hernits K; Leito I
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jun; 32(6):711-722. PubMed ID: 29846868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. COSMO-RS blind prediction of distribution coefficients and aqueous pKa values from the SAMPL8 challenge.
Diedenhofen M; Eckert F; Terzi S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Aug; 37(8):395-405. PubMed ID: 37365370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.
Bannan CC; Burley KH; Chiu M; Shirts MR; Gilson MK; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):927-944. PubMed ID: 27677750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients with COSMO-RS on the SAMPL5 data set.
Klamt A; Eckert F; Reinisch J; Wichmann K
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):959-967. PubMed ID: 27460058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. COSMO-RS based predictions for the SAMPL6 logP challenge.
Loschen C; Reinisch J; Klamt A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):385-392. PubMed ID: 31773462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of micelle/water and liposome/water partition coefficients based on molecular dynamics simulations, COSMO-RS, and COSMOmic.
Ingram T; Storm S; Kloss L; Mehling T; Jakobtorweihen S; Smirnova I
Langmuir; 2013 Mar; 29(11):3527-37. PubMed ID: 23398189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SAMPL9 blind predictions for toluene/water partition coefficients using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
Procacci P; Guarnieri G
J Chem Phys; 2023 Mar; 158(12):124117. PubMed ID: 37003748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting Partition Coefficients of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffin Congeners by COSMO-RS-Trained Fragment Contribution Models.
Endo S; Hammer J
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(23):15162-15169. PubMed ID: 33207873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of Partition Coefficients of Environmental Toxins Using Computational Chemistry Methods.
van der Spoel D; Manzetti S; Zhang H; Klamt A
ACS Omega; 2019 Aug; 4(9):13772-13781. PubMed ID: 31497695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of the n-octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 blind challenge from MST continuum solvation calculations.
Zamora WJ; Pinheiro S; German K; Ràfols C; Curutchet C; Luque FJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):443-451. PubMed ID: 31776809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Purely Predicting the Pharmaceutical Solubility: What to Expect from PC-SAFT and COSMO-RS?
Klajmon M
Mol Pharm; 2022 Nov; 19(11):4212-4232. PubMed ID: 36136040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.
Işık M; Levorse D; Mobley DL; Rhodes T; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):405-420. PubMed ID: 31858363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two computational methods for solvent screening in countercurrent and centrifugal partition chromatography.
Vilas-Boas SM; Cordova IW; Kurnia KA; Almeida HHS; Gaschi PS; Coutinho JAP; Pinho SP; Ferreira O
J Chromatogr A; 2022 Mar; 1666():462859. PubMed ID: 35124362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterizing PUF disk passive air samplers for alkyl-substituted PAHs: Measured and modelled PUF-AIR partition coefficients with COSMO-RS.
Parnis JM; Eng A; Mackay D; Harner T
Chemosphere; 2016 Feb; 145():360-4. PubMed ID: 26692513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
