476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37987431)
1. Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT in Navigating the Spanish Medical Residency Entrance Examination (MIR): Promising Horizons for AI in Clinical Medicine.
Guillen-Grima F; Guillen-Aguinaga S; Guillen-Aguinaga L; Alas-Brun R; Onambele L; Ortega W; Montejo R; Aguinaga-Ontoso E; Barach P; Aguinaga-Ontoso I
Clin Pract; 2023 Nov; 13(6):1460-1487. PubMed ID: 37987431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study.
Wilhelm TI; Roos J; Kaczmarczyk R
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e49324. PubMed ID: 37902826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance Comparison of ChatGPT-4 and Japanese Medical Residents in the General Medicine In-Training Examination: Comparison Study.
Watari T; Takagi S; Sakaguchi K; Nishizaki Y; Shimizu T; Yamamoto Y; Tokuda Y
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Dec; 9():e52202. PubMed ID: 38055323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the Performance of Popular Large Language Models on the National Board of Medical Examiners Sample Questions.
Abbas A; Rehman MS; Rehman SS
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55991. PubMed ID: 38606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial Intelligence for Anesthesiology Board-Style Examination Questions: Role of Large Language Models.
Khan AA; Yunus R; Sohail M; Rehman TA; Saeed S; Bu Y; Jackson CD; Sharkey A; Mahmood F; Matyal R
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 May; 38(5):1251-1259. PubMed ID: 38423884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GPT-4 Artificial Intelligence Model Outperforms ChatGPT, Medical Students, and Neurosurgery Residents on Neurosurgery Written Board-Like Questions.
Guerra GA; Hofmann H; Sobhani S; Hofmann G; Gomez D; Soroudi D; Hopkins BS; Dallas J; Pangal DJ; Cheok S; Nguyen VN; Mack WJ; Zada G
World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e160-e165. PubMed ID: 37597659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e56655. PubMed ID: 38630520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing ChatGPT's Mastery of Bloom's Taxonomy Using Psychosomatic Medicine Exam Questions: Mixed-Methods Study.
Herrmann-Werner A; Festl-Wietek T; Holderried F; Herschbach L; Griewatz J; Masters K; Zipfel S; Mahling M
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jan; 26():e52113. PubMed ID: 38261378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Resident and AI Chatbot Performance on the University of Toronto Family Medicine Residency Progress Test: Comparative Study.
Huang RS; Lu KJQ; Meaney C; Kemppainen J; Punnett A; Leung FH
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e50514. PubMed ID: 37725411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of ChatGPT on Medical Questions in the National Medical Licensing Examination in Japan: Evaluation Study.
Yanagita Y; Yokokawa D; Uchida S; Tawara J; Ikusaka M
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Oct; 7():e48023. PubMed ID: 37831496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.
Abdullahi T; Singh R; Eickhoff C
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51391. PubMed ID: 38349725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stratified Evaluation of GPT's Question Answering in Surgery Reveals Artificial Intelligence (AI) Knowledge Gaps.
Murphy Lonergan R; Curry J; Dhas K; Simmons BI
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48788. PubMed ID: 38098921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a Neurosurgery Oral Boards Preparation Question Bank.
Ali R; Tang OY; Connolly ID; Fridley JS; Shin JH; Zadnik Sullivan PL; Cielo D; Oyelese AA; Doberstein CE; Telfeian AE; Gokaslan ZL; Asaad WF
Neurosurgery; 2023 Nov; 93(5):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 37306460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT, Bing, and Medical Students in Germany.
Roos J; Kasapovic A; Jansen T; Kaczmarczyk R
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e46482. PubMed ID: 37665620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Potential of GPT-4 as a Support Tool for Pharmacists: Analytical Study Using the Japanese National Examination for Pharmacists.
Kunitsu Y
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Oct; 9():e48452. PubMed ID: 37837968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
ArXiv; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38529075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 With That of Medical Students on the Written German Medical Licensing Examination: Observational Study.
Meyer A; Riese J; Streichert T
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e50965. PubMed ID: 38329802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard on the official board examination of the Japan Radiology Society.
Toyama Y; Harigai A; Abe M; Nagano M; Kawabata M; Seki Y; Takase K
Jpn J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 37792149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of GPT-4V in Answering the Japanese Otolaryngology Board Certification Examination Questions: Evaluation Study.
Noda M; Ueno T; Koshu R; Takaso Y; Shimada MD; Saito C; Sugimoto H; Fushiki H; Ito M; Nomura A; Yoshizaki T
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Mar; 10():e57054. PubMed ID: 38546736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating large language models on a highly-specialized topic, radiation oncology physics.
Holmes J; Liu Z; Zhang L; Ding Y; Sio TT; McGee LA; Ashman JB; Li X; Liu T; Shen J; Liu W
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1219326. PubMed ID: 37529688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
