113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37988431)
1. Evaluation of the labial protrusion and lip esthetic changes after complete denture treatment through stereophotogrammetry.
Pucciarelli MGR; Toyoshima GHL; Neppelenbroek KH; Sforza C; de Menezes M; Oliveira TM; Soares S
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Nov; 0(0):1-25. PubMed ID: 37988431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation by 3D stereophotogrammetry of facial changes in edentulous patients after rehabilitation.
Toyoshima GHL; Pucciarelli MGR; Neppelenbroek KH; Sforza C; Menezes M; Oliveira TM; Soares S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 30():e20210462. PubMed ID: 34932690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D assessment of facial contours of patients wearing either complete denture or implant-supported fixed dentures.
Demirekin ZB; Gunaydin A; Cavdarli K; Findik Y; Turkaslan S; Baykul T
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Mar; 25(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 35295050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying the facial proportions in edentulous individuals before and after rehabilitation with complete dentures compared with dentate individuals: A 3D stereophotogrammetry study.
Pucciarelli MGR; Hideki de Lima Toyoshima G; de Oliveira TM; Neppelenbroek KH; Soares S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 35431030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Facial aesthetic evaluation of rehabilitation effects in edentulous patients with varying degrees of residual ridge resorption by 3D stereophotogrammetry.
Tang J; Wang Y; Wang Z; Guo Y; Wang C
J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 47(9):1095-1102. PubMed ID: 32535931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in Lip Support with and without Labial Flanges in a Maxillary Edentulous Population. Part 1: Objective Analysis.
Bidra AS; Zapata G; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Grady J
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 28561267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability Study of Angular and Linear Measurements on Facial Morphology Analysis by Means of Stereophotogrammetry.
Andrade LM; Rodrigues da Silva AMB; Magri LV; Rodrigues da Silva MAM
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):1107-1111. PubMed ID: 28212123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue profile in 12-year-old southern Chinese.
Leung CS; Yang Y; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lo J; McGrath C
Head Face Med; 2014 Dec; 10():56. PubMed ID: 25540054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in Lip Support with and without Labial Flanges in a Maxillary Edentulous Population. Part 2: Blinded Subjective Analysis.
Bidra AS; Manzotti A; Wu R
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 28561307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lay People Esthetic Evaluation of Primary Surgical Repair on Three-Dimensional Images of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
Staderini E; De Luca M; Candida E; Rizzo MI; Rajabtork Zadeh O; Bucci D; Zama M; Lajolo C; Cordaro M; Gallenzi P
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Sep; 55(9):. PubMed ID: 31500380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of three-dimensional changes in lip vermilion in adult female patients after orthodontic extraction: a retrospective longitudinal study.
Shen LH; Xie TY; Jiang RP; Jiang YR; Chen G; Xu TM; Han B
Head Face Med; 2021 Mar; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 33741006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of lip support on the soft-tissue profile of complete denture wearers.
Kamashita Y; Kamada Y; Kawahata N; Nagaoka E
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 16457669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
Huang YP; Li WR
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.
Bravo LA
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8172393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using three-dimensional average facial meshes to determine nasolabial soft tissue deformity in adult UCLP patients.
Wong KWF; Keeling A; Achal K; Khambay B
Surgeon; 2019 Feb; 17(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 29880431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern.
Oh JH; Park JH; Cho HJ; Seo HY; Chae JM
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
