These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37988431)

  • 21. Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
    Kocher K; Kowalski P; Kolokitha OE; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e45-52. PubMed ID: 25932752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes Around the Lips After Mandibular Setback Surgery With Minimal Orthodontics Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry.
    Kim YK; Moon SW; Yun PY; Lee YS; Larson BE; Lee NK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 74(5):1044-54. PubMed ID: 26706496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What Did the Ideal Beauty of the 15th Century Look Like? An Anthropometric Analysis of Botticelli Portraits.
    Jung SG; Kim H; Hwang K; Hwang YJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38842307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional evaluation of smile characteristics in subjects with increased vertical facial dimensions.
    Demir R; Baysal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jun; 157(6):773-782. PubMed ID: 32487307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences in Lip Support with and without Labial Flanges in a Maxillary Edentulous Population. Part 4: Patient-Centered Analysis.
    Bidra AS; Touloumi F; Wu R
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 28561383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multidimensional esthetic evaluation of patients with a cleft lip and palate wearing a maxillary partial removable dental prosthesis: A 5-year retrospective study.
    Yu D; Xing G; Nie P; Zhang X; Steve Shen G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 26581658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Validation of the digital integration technology for evaluating the nasolabial morphology variation after the cross-arch fixed restoration of maxillary implant-supported prostheses].
    Hao KY; Luo J; DI P; Guo HZ; Shen HD; Liu YP; Zhang Y; Lin Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Oct; 52(5):924-930. PubMed ID: 33047731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Immediate effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the naso-maxillary facial soft tissue using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Altorkat Y; Khambay BS; McDonald JP; Cross DL; Brocklebank LM; Ju X
    Surgeon; 2016 Apr; 14(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 24947501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on lower facial form and perceived facial esthetics: A digital evaluation.
    Sun J; Lin YC; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):546-552. PubMed ID: 32981714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nasolabial symmetry and esthetics in cleft lip and palate: analysis of 3D facial images.
    Desmedt DJ; Maal TJ; Kuijpers MA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Fudalej PS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Nov; 19(8):1833-42. PubMed ID: 25802221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Morphometry and displacement analysis of the upper lips following maxillary full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: a 3D morphometric study.
    Hao K; Luo J; Di P; Zhang Y; Lin Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):461. PubMed ID: 34556104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated craniofacial landmarks detection on 3D image using geometry characteristics information.
    Abu A; Ngo CG; Abu-Hassan NIA; Othman SA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 19(Suppl 13):548. PubMed ID: 30717658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of facial esthetic standards between Latin American and Asian populations using 3D stereophotogrammetric analysis.
    Bayome M; Park JH; Shoaib AM; Lee NK; Boettner V; Kook YA
    J World Fed Orthod; 2020 Sep; 9(3):129-136. PubMed ID: 32873518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of facial morphology in adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate, and patients without clefts.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Asi SM; Ismail NH; Rahman ZA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 24342372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing Normal Smiling Function Through 3D-3D Surfaces Registration: An Innovative Method for the Assessment of Facial Mimicry.
    Pucciarelli V; Gibelli D; Barni L; Gagliano N; Dolci C; Sforza C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Apr; 42(2):456-463. PubMed ID: 29264683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 3D soft-tissue evaluation of a Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expander and face mask in pre-pubertal phase-A retrospective cohort study.
    Krneta Đokić B; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Verdenik I; Ovsenik M
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Aug; 23(3):323-331. PubMed ID: 32163667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Soft Tissue Esthetic Changes Following a Modified Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Prospective Study.
    Shahamfar M; Atashi MHA; Azima N
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(3):255-260. PubMed ID: 32904097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.