BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37988448)

  • 1. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Machado MF; Felix N; Melo PHC; Gauza MM; Calomeni P; Generoso G; Khatri S; Altmayer S; Blankstein R; Bittencourt MS; Cardoso R
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Nov; 16(11):e015800. PubMed ID: 37988448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Strategies for the Assessment of Suspected Stable Coronary Artery Disease : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zito A; Galli M; Biondi-Zoccai G; Abbate A; Douglas PS; Princi G; D'Amario D; Aurigemma C; Romagnoli E; Trani C; Burzotta F
    Ann Intern Med; 2023 Jun; 176(6):817-826. PubMed ID: 37276592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of stable angina by coronary computed tomographic angiography versus standard of care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Palicherla A; Ismayl M; Thandra A; Budoff M; Shaikh K
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Feb; 59():67-75. PubMed ID: 37541837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
    Hulten E; Pickett C; Bittencourt MS; Villines TC; Petrillo S; Di Carli MF; Blankstein R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Feb; 61(8):880-92. PubMed ID: 23395069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography versus standard of care strategy for the evaluation of low risk chest pain: are randomized controlled trials and cohort studies showing the same evidence?
    El-Hayek G; Benjo A; Uretsky S; Al-Mallah M; Cohen R; Bamira D; Chavez P; Nascimento F; Santana O; Patel R; Cavalcante JL
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):238-45. PubMed ID: 25499386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acute chest pain evaluation using coronary computed tomography angiography compared with standard of care: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
    Gongora CA; Bavishi C; Uretsky S; Argulian E
    Heart; 2018 Feb; 104(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 28855273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mid- to long-term clinical outcomes between anatomical testing and usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Hwang IC; Choi SJ; Choi JE; Ko EB; Suh JK; Choi I; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Kim JY
    Clin Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 40(11):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 28914973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.
    Chang HJ; Lin FY; Gebow D; An HY; Andreini D; Bathina R; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Cerci R; Choi EY; Choi JH; Choi SY; Chung N; Cole J; Doh JH; Ha SJ; Her AY; Kepka C; Kim JY; Kim JW; Kim SW; Kim W; Pontone G; Valeti U; Villines TC; Lu Y; Kumar A; Cho I; Danad I; Han D; Heo R; Lee SE; Lee JH; Park HB; Sung JM; Leflang D; Zullo J; Shaw LJ; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 12(7 Pt 2):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 30553687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Compared With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as a Guide to Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients Presenting With Stable Angina: The RESCUE Trial.
    Stillman AE; Gatsonis C; Lima JAC; Liu T; Snyder BS; Cormack J; Malholtra V; Schnall MD; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U; Woodard PK;
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Dec; 9(24):e017993. PubMed ID: 33283579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with low-to-intermediate risk chest pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen Y; Fan Y; Yin Z; Zhang H; Zhang Y; Han Z; Wang C
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(2):2096-2103. PubMed ID: 27926497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost.
    Lee SP; Seo JK; Hwang IC; Park JB; Park EA; Lee W; Paeng JC; Lee HJ; Yoon YE; Kim HL; Koh E; Choi I; Choi JE; Kim YJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 20(4):417-425. PubMed ID: 30052964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Fordyce CB; Douglas PS; Roberts RS; Hoffmann U; Al-Khalidi HR; Patel MR; Granger CB; Kostis J; Mark DB; Lee KL; Udelson JE;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 2(4):400-408. PubMed ID: 28199464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.
    Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rest-Only Myocardial CT Perfusion in Acute Chest Pain.
    Thomas DM; Larson CW; Cheezum MK; Villines TC; Branch KR; Blankstein R; Cury RC; Slim AM
    South Med J; 2015 Nov; 108(11):688-94. PubMed ID: 26539951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Qiao HY; Tang CX; Schoepf UJ; Tesche C; Bayer RR; Giovagnoli DA; Todd Hudson H; Zhou CS; Yan J; Lu MJ; Zhou F; Lu GM; Jiang JW; Zhang LJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5841-5851. PubMed ID: 32462444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age and Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the DISCHARGE Randomized Clinical Trial.
    ; Bosserdt M; Serna-Higuita LM; Feuchtner G; Merkely B; Kofoed KF; Benedek T; Donnelly P; Rodriguez-Palomares J; Erglis A; Štechovský C; Šakalyte G; Adic NC; Gutberlet M; Dodd JD; Diez I; Davis G; Zimmermann E; Kepka C; Vidakovic R; Francone M; Ilnicka-Suckiel M; Plank F; Knuuti J; Faria R; Schröder S; Berry C; Saba L; Ruzsics B; Rieckmann N; Kubiak C; Hansen KS; Müller-Nordhorn J; Szilveszter B; Sigvardsen PE; Benedek I; Orr C; Valente FX; Zvaigzne L; Suchánek V; Jankauskas A; Adic F; Woinke M; Hensey M; Lecumberri I; Thwaite E; Laule M; Kruk M; Neskovic AN; Mancone M; Kusmierz D; Pietilä M; Ribeiro VG; Drosch T; Delles C; Porcu M; Fisher M; Boussoussou M; Kragelund C; Aurelian R; Kelly S; Garcia Del Blanco B; Rubio A; Maurovich-Horvat P; Hove JD; Rodean I; Regan S; Cuellar-Calabria H; Molnár L; Larsen L; Hodas R; Napp AE; Haase R; Feger S; Mohamed M; Neumann K; Dreger H; Rief M; Wieske V; Estrella M; Martus P; Sox HC; Dewey M
    JAMA Cardiol; 2024 Apr; 9(4):346-356. PubMed ID: 38416472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical significance of evaluating coronary atherosclerosis in adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who have chest pain.
    Shin YJ; Lee JH; Yoo JY; Kim JA; Jeon Y; Yoon YE; Chun EJ
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4593-4602. PubMed ID: 30796567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Foy AJ; Dhruva SS; Peterson B; Mandrola JM; Morgan DJ; Redberg RF
    JAMA Intern Med; 2017 Nov; 177(11):1623-1631. PubMed ID: 28973101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-year outcomes of CCTA alone versus machine learning-based FFR
    Qiao HY; Tang CX; Schoepf UJ; Bayer RR; Tesche C; Di Jiang M; Yin CQ; Zhou CS; Zhou F; Lu MJ; Jiang JW; Lu GM; Ni QQ; Zhang LJ
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Aug; 32(8):5179-5188. PubMed ID: 35175380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.