230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37988758)
21. Penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction for improved microcalcification detection in breast tomosynthesis.
Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Apr; 30(4):904-14. PubMed ID: 21041158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detector Blur and Correlated Noise Modeling for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Jan; 37(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 28767366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet-printed anthropomorphic phantom.
Ikejimba LC; Salad J; Graff CG; Ghammraoui B; Cheng WC; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3883-3892. PubMed ID: 31135960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantitative assessment of microcalcification cluster image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis, 2-dimensional and synthetic mammography.
Petropoulos AE; Skiadopoulos SG; Karahaliou AN; Messaris GAT; Arikidis NS; Costaridou LI
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Jan; 58(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 31813091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multi-scale cascaded networks for synthesis of mammogram to decrease intensity distortion and increase model-based perceptual similarity.
Jiang G; He Z; Zhou Y; Wei J; Xu Y; Zeng H; Wu J; Qin G; Chen W; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):837-853. PubMed ID: 36196045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automated Segmentation of Mass Regions in DBT Images Using a Dilated DCNN Approach.
Ye J; Yang W; Wang J; Xu X; Li L; Xie C; Chen G; Wang X; Lai X
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9082694. PubMed ID: 35154309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiation Dose Reduction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis by MTANN with Multi-scale Kernels.
Deng Z; Jin Z; Suzuki K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-7. PubMed ID: 38082827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automatic Classification of Simulated Breast Tomosynthesis Whole Images for the Presence of Microcalcification Clusters Using Deep CNNs.
Mota AM; Clarkson MJ; Almeida P; Matela N
J Imaging; 2022 Aug; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 36135397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SAH-NET: Structure-Aware Hierarchical Network for Clustered Microcalcification Classification in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Sun H; Wu S; Chen X; Li M; Kong L; Yang X; Meng Y; Chen S; Zheng J
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2024 Apr; 54(4):2345-2357. PubMed ID: 36264744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. X-ray source motion blur modeling and deblurring with generative diffusion for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38640913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Multi-domain features for reducing false positives in automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang F; Wu S; Zhang C; Chen Q; Yang X; Jiang K; Zheng J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1300-1308. PubMed ID: 30661242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):7092-7112. PubMed ID: 27648708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Deep-learning-based projection-domain breast thickness estimation for shape-prior iterative image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Lee S; Kim H; Lee H; Cho S
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3670-3682. PubMed ID: 35297075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A virtual trial framework for quantifying the detectability of masses in breast tomosynthesis projection data.
Young S; Bakic PR; Myers KJ; Jennings RJ; Park S
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051914. PubMed ID: 23635284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.
Chan HP; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA; Zelakiewicz S; Schmitz A; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Nees AV; Neal CH; Carson P; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):675-85. PubMed ID: 25007048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
Polat A; Yildirim I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
