119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37988776)
1. Cesarean section prevalence based on prenatal care provider, location, and wealth index: A comparative analysis in peru's healthcare systems.
Moquillaza-Alcantara VH; Palacios-Vivanco DP
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2023 Dec; 38():100924. PubMed ID: 37988776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in the prevalence of cesarean section and associated factors in private and public healthcare systems in Peru.
Hernández-Vásquez A; Chacón-Torrico H; Bendezu-Quispe G
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2020 Dec; 26():100570. PubMed ID: 33130536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.
Vieira GO; Fernandes LG; de Oliveira NF; Silva LR; Vieira Tde O
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():132. PubMed ID: 26043857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association between location of prenatal care services and non-consented cesarean sections in Mexico: A secondary analysis of the National Survey on the Dynamics of Household Relationships 2016.
Marian M; Pérez RL
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303052. PubMed ID: 38743743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cesarean section rates according to the Robson Classification and its association with adequacy levels of prenatal care: a cross-sectional hospital-based study in Brazil.
Piva VMR; Voget V; Nucci LB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Jun; 23(1):455. PubMed ID: 37340447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India.
Singh P; Hashmi G; Swain PK
BMC Public Health; 2018 May; 18(1):613. PubMed ID: 29747609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alarming Trends of Cesarean Section-Time to Rethink: Evidence From a Large-Scale Cross-sectional Sample Survey in India.
Pandey AK; Raushan MR; Gautam D; Neogi SB
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e41892. PubMed ID: 36780228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geographic and socioeconomic inequalities in cesarean birth rates in Peru: A comparison between 2009 and 2018.
Hernández-Vásquez A; Chacón-Torrico H; Bendezu-Quispe G
Birth; 2022 Mar; 49(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 34240458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Institutional setting and wealth gradients in cesarean delivery rates: Evidence from six developing countries.
Sepehri A
Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 29314234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in Jamaica.
Webster LA; Daling JR; McFarlane C; Ashley D; Warren CW
J Biosoc Sci; 1992 Oct; 24(4):515-25. PubMed ID: 1429779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of institutional delivery and its correlates amongst women of reproductive age in Mozambique: a cross-sectional analysis.
Yaya S; Idriss-Wheeler D; Shibre G; Amouzou A; Bishwajit G
Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):49. PubMed ID: 32299468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.
Bhatia M; Banerjee K; Dixit P; Dwivedi LK
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Aug; 3(8):e2015022. PubMed ID: 32857148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between the type of provider and Cesarean section delivery in India: A socioeconomic analysis of the National Family Health Surveys 1999, 2006, 2016.
Lee HY; Kim R; Oh J; Subramanian SV
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248283. PubMed ID: 33684180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two decades of antenatal and delivery care in Uganda: a cross-sectional study using Demographic and Health Surveys.
Benova L; Dennis ML; Lange IL; Campbell OMR; Waiswa P; Haemmerli M; Fernandez Y; Kerber K; Lawn JE; Santos AC; Matovu F; Macleod D; Goodman C; Penn-Kekana L; Ssengooba F; Lynch CA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Oct; 18(1):758. PubMed ID: 30286749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean section.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1989; 10(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 12342592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maternal near miss among women admitted in major private hospitals in eastern Ethiopia: a retrospective study.
Tenaw SG; Assefa N; Mulatu T; Tura AK
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):181. PubMed ID: 33663429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Length of stay after childbirth in India: a comparative study of public and private health institutions.
Kumar P; Dhillon P
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):181. PubMed ID: 32293327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variations in the prevalence of caesarean section deliveries in India between 2016 and 2021 - an analysis of Tamil Nadu and Chhattisgarh.
Neethi Mohan V; Shirisha P; Vaidyanathan G; Muraleedharan VR
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Aug; 23(1):622. PubMed ID: 37649006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rates and trends in cesarean sections between 2008 and 2012 in Iraq.
Shabila NP
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):22. PubMed ID: 28077096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in four Hard-to-Reach areas of Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey.
Karim F; Ali NB; Khan ANS; Hassan A; Hasan MM; Hoque DME; Billah SM; El Arifeen S; Chowdhury MAK
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234249. PubMed ID: 32516321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
