These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37989013)

  • 1. Hidden realities: Food waste from servings in mini size packaging.
    Doğdu G; Pekdemir T; Lakestani S; Karabörk Ş; Çavuş O
    Waste Manag; 2024 Jan; 173():141-151. PubMed ID: 37989013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental impacts characterization of packaging waste generated by urban food delivery services. A big-data analysis in Jing-Jin-Ji region (China).
    Liu G; Agostinho F; Duan H; Song G; Wang X; Giannetti BF; Santagata R; Casazza M; Lega M
    Waste Manag; 2020 Nov; 117():157-169. PubMed ID: 32828013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recycling potential of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in Finland.
    Dahlbo H; Poliakova V; Mylläri V; Sahimaa O; Anderson R
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():52-61. PubMed ID: 29097129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compostability of bioplastic packaging materials: an overview.
    Kale G; Kijchavengkul T; Auras R; Rubino M; Selke SE; Singh SP
    Macromol Biosci; 2007 Mar; 7(3):255-77. PubMed ID: 17370278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seafood consumers engagement in reducing environmental impacts from packaging.
    Almeida C; Laso J; de Sousa DB; Cooney R; Quinteiro P; Rowan N; Dias AC; Clifford E; Reboredo RG; Margallo M; Nunes ML; Marques A
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 863():160846. PubMed ID: 36526197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Review on Biodegradable Packaging Films from Vegetative and Food Waste.
    Gupta P; Toksha B; Rahaman M
    Chem Rec; 2022 Jul; 22(7):e202100326. PubMed ID: 35253984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review on takeaway packaging waste: Types, ecological impact, and disposal route.
    Zhuo Y; He J; Li W; Deng J; Lin Q
    Environ Pollut; 2023 Nov; 337():122518. PubMed ID: 37678737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-consumer plastic packaging waste from online food delivery services in South Korea.
    Jang Y; Nam Kim K; Woo J
    Waste Manag; 2023 Feb; 156():177-186. PubMed ID: 36481706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review on colorimetric indicators for monitoring product freshness in intelligent food packaging: Indicator dyes, preparation methods, and applications.
    Luo X; Zaitoon A; Lim LT
    Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf; 2022 May; 21(3):2489-2519. PubMed ID: 35365965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From evaluation to action: Testing nudging strategies to prevent food waste in school canteens.
    Vidal-Mones B; Diaz-Ruiz R; M Gil J
    Waste Manag; 2022 Mar; 140():90-99. PubMed ID: 35074535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental and economic assessment of food-packaging systems with a focus on food waste. Case study on tomato ketchup.
    Wohner B; Gabriel VH; Krenn B; Krauter V; Tacker M
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 738():139846. PubMed ID: 32535282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer Acceptability and Sensory Profile of Sustainable Paper-Based Packaging.
    Lignou S; Oloyede OO
    Foods; 2021 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 34062787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural leaf-type as food packaging material for traditional food in Nigeria: sustainability aspects and theoretical circular economy solutions.
    Ezeudu OB; Agunwamba JC; Ezeudu TS; Ugochukwu UC; Ezeasor IC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(7):8833-8843. PubMed ID: 33073308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Industry challenges and approaches to food waste.
    Tavill G
    Physiol Behav; 2020 Sep; 223():112993. PubMed ID: 32502525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of food packaging generation and material loss from major retailers in Taipei, Taiwan.
    Wang CH; Lin HT
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jan; 137():139-149. PubMed ID: 34773907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical emptiability of dairy product packaging and its environmental implications in Austria.
    Wohner B; Schwarzinger N; Gürlich U; Heinrich V; Tacker M
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7578. PubMed ID: 31565562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value-added utilization of fruit and vegetable processing by-products for the manufacture of biodegradable food packaging films.
    Karimi Sani I; Masoudpour-Behabadi M; Alizadeh Sani M; Motalebinejad H; Juma ASM; Asdagh A; Eghbaljoo H; Khodaei SM; Rhim JW; Mohammadi F
    Food Chem; 2023 Mar; 405(Pt B):134964. PubMed ID: 36435110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating Food Packaging Waste in Schools: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Heiges J; Lee DL; Vollmer L; Wobbekind K; Thompson HR; Gosliner W; Madsen KA; O'Neill K; Ritchie LD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35565014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevention policies addressing packaging and packaging waste: Some emerging trends.
    Tencati A; Pogutz S; Moda B; Brambilla M; Cacia C
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():35-45. PubMed ID: 27372152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active biopackaging produced from by-products and waste from food and marine industries.
    Debeaufort F
    FEBS Open Bio; 2021 Apr; 11(4):984-998. PubMed ID: 33595926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.