184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37989801)
21. Reduction of
Sekine T; Delso G; Zeimpekis KG; de Galiza Barbosa F; Ter Voert EEGW; Huellner M; Veit-Haibach P
Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):249-259. PubMed ID: 28914600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system.
Shirakawa Y; Matsutomo N
Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Sep; 16(3):384-396. PubMed ID: 37368168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.
Taniguchi T; Akamatsu G; Kasahara Y; Mitsumoto K; Baba S; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Mikasa S; Kidera D; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25258046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Applications of both time of flight and point spread function in brain PET image reconstruction.
Shao X; Shao X; Wang X; Wang Y
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 26637071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A GPU-accelerated fully 3D OSEM image reconstruction for a high-resolution small animal PET scanner using dual-ended readout detectors.
Zeng T; Gao J; Gao D; Kuang Z; Sang Z; Wang X; Hu L; Chen Q; Chu X; Liang D; Liu X; Yang Y; Zheng H; Hu Z
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245007. PubMed ID: 32679581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative study of physiological FDG uptake in small structures between silicon photomultiplier-based PET and conventional PET.
Watanabe S; Hirata K; Magota K; Takenaka J; Wakabayashi N; Shinyama D; Yasuda K; Homma A; Kudo K
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 38(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 37943379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Treatment response assessment in [
Dolci C; Spadavecchia C; Crivellaro C; De Ponti E; Todde S; Morzenti S; Turolla EA; Crespi A; Guerra L; Landoni C
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():177-182. PubMed ID: 30738523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Hao X; Wu P; Zhao B; Qin Z; Xie J; Li S
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10328. PubMed ID: 33990659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases.
Rogasch JM; Steffen IG; Hofheinz F; Großer OS; Furth C; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Apostolova I; Amthauer H
EJNMMI Res; 2015; 5():31. PubMed ID: 25992306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multi-Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET Imaging Using a Time-of-Flight PET/MR Scanner: Comparison with Clinical Single-Atlas- and CT-Based Attenuation Correction.
Sekine T; Burgos N; Warnock G; Huellner M; Buck A; Ter Voert EE; Cardoso MJ; Hutton BF; Ourselin S; Veit-Haibach P; Delso G
J Nucl Med; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1258-64. PubMed ID: 27013697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reducing Radiation Exposure to Paediatric Patients Undergoing [18F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging.
Kertész H; Beyer T; London K; Saleh H; Chung D; Rausch I; Cal-Gonzalez J; Kitsos T; Kench PL
Mol Imaging Biol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):775-786. PubMed ID: 33846898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Standardization of image reconstruction parameters for dynamic fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Sharma A; Pandey AK; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Vishnubhatla S; Sharma MC; Jain D; Thulkar S; Gupta P; Bal CS; Kumar R
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Dec; 39(12):1207-1217. PubMed ID: 30371603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Influence of Reconstruction FOV and Matrix Size on the Quantitative Accuracy of FDG-PET: Comparison between OSEM and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood].
Mikami S; Nakamura F; Nakamura A; Torizuka T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 34011788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Technical Note: Performance evaluation of a small-animal PET/CT system based on NEMA NU 4-2008 standards.
Liu Q; Li C; Liu J; Krish K; Fu X; Zhao J; Chen JC
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5272-5282. PubMed ID: 34252215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of small-animal PET prototype using silicon photomultiplier (SiPM): initial results of phantom and animal imaging studies.
Kwon SI; Lee JS; Yoon HS; Ito M; Ko GB; Choi JY; Lee SH; Chan Song I; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Hong SJ
J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):572-9. PubMed ID: 21421723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
