BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37990306)

  • 1. Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients.
    Xiong T; Chen H; Fan W
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):476. PubMed ID: 37990306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of visual outcomes between bilateral implantation and mix-and-match implantation of three types intraocular lenses.
    Ke S; Wan W; Li C
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 43(4):1143-1152. PubMed ID: 36125586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Observation of visual quality after implantation of a rotational asymmetric refractive intraocular lens with a low addition region using the micromonovision design].
    Li YW; Liu Y; Li X; Wang SN; Zheng GY
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 59(12):1019-1029. PubMed ID: 38061903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Mix-and-Match Implantation of an Extended Depth-of-Focus and a Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens.
    Kim S; Yi R; Chung SH
    Eye Contact Lens; 2022 Jun; 48(6):261-266. PubMed ID: 35333819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial.
    Reinhard T; Maier P; Böhringer D; Bertelmann E; Brockmann T; Kiraly L; Salom D; Piovella M; Colonval S; Mendicute J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 259(2):431-442. PubMed ID: 32915276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual performance comparison of 2 extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.
    Schojai M; Schultz T; Jerke C; Böcker J; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Mar; 46(3):388-393. PubMed ID: 32142039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.
    Lubiński W; Podborączyńska-Jodko K; Kirkiewicz M; Mularczyk M; Post M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 40(10):2553-2562. PubMed ID: 32488596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual performance and patient satisfaction after implantation of extended range-of-vision IOLs: bilateral implantation vs 2 different mix-and-match approaches.
    Koo OS; Kang JW; Park JK; Kim KH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Feb; 47(2):192-197. PubMed ID: 32947388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of reading performance with low add bifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses implanted with mini-monovision.
    Turhan SA; Sevik MO; Toker E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):315-323. PubMed ID: 32914276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens and an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.
    Singh B; Sharma S; Dadia S; Bharti N; Bharti S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Sep; 46(5):314-318. PubMed ID: 31283552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Outcomes after Bilateral Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens: A Multicenter Study.
    Choi M; Im CY; Lee JK; Kim HI; Park HS; Kim TI
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):439-445. PubMed ID: 33307603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study.
    Cochener B;
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1268-1275. PubMed ID: 27697244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparative Evaluation of a New Generation of Diffractive Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.
    Cochener B; Boutillier G; Lamard M; Auberger-Zagnoli C
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Aug; 34(8):507-514. PubMed ID: 30089179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Bilateral Implantation of an EDOF IOL and a Mix-and-Match Approach.
    Tarib I; Kasier I; Herbers C; Hagen P; Breyer D; Kaymak H; Klabe K; Lucchesi R; Teisch S; Diakonis VF; Hahn U; Fabian H; Kretz FTA
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 35(7):408-416. PubMed ID: 31298720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of a monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function compared with an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens.
    Lee JH; Moon SY; Chung HS; Park SY; Lee H; Kim JY; Tchah H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 34117177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A case-control study.
    Sabur H; Unsal U
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):262-268. PubMed ID: 36062601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison Between Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal IOL and Mix-and-Match Implantation of a Bifocal IOL and an Extended Depth of Focus IOL.
    Song JE; Khoramnia R; Son HS; Knorz MC; Choi CY
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Aug; 36(8):528-535. PubMed ID: 32785726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery.
    Wilkins MR; Allan BD; Rubin GS; Findl O; Hollick EJ; Bunce C; Xing W;
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2449-2455.e1. PubMed ID: 24070808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision and trifocal intraocular lenses.
    Ruiz-Mesa R; Abengózar-Vela A; Aramburu A; Ruiz-Santos M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 27(4):460-465. PubMed ID: 28165609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of pseudophakic mini-monovision using a new monofocal intraocular lens.
    Park ES; Ahn H; Han SU; Jun I; Seo KY; Kim EK; Kim TI
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21716. PubMed ID: 36522397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.