These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37990924)

  • 1. Evaluating Risk Prediction with Data Collection Costs: Novel Estimation of Test Tradeoff Curves.
    Baker SG
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Jan; 44(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 37990924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction using the test tradeoff: an update.
    Baker SG; Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22499728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple Decision-Analytic Functions of the AUC for Ruling Out a Risk Prediction Model and an Added Predictor.
    Baker SG
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 29025299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metrics for Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores.
    Baker SG
    JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 34957374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.
    Lee CC; Chen CW; Yen HK; Lin YP; Lai CY; Wang JL; Groot OQ; Janssen SJ; Schwab JH; Hsu FM; Lin WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Dec; 482(12):2193-2208. PubMed ID: 39051924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
    Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
    Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to interpret a small increase in AUC with an additional risk prediction marker: decision analysis comes through.
    Baker SG; Schuit E; Steyerberg EW; Pencina MJ; Vickers A; Moons KG; Mol BW; Lindeman KS
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3946-59. PubMed ID: 24825728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators.
    Van Calster B; Wynants L; Verbeek JFM; Verbakel JY; Christodoulou E; Vickers AJ; Roobol MJ; Steyerberg EW
    Eur Urol; 2018 Dec; 74(6):796-804. PubMed ID: 30241973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?
    Pan YT; Lin YP; Yen HK; Yen HH; Huang CC; Hsieh HC; Janssen S; Hu MH; Lin WH; Groot OQ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Sep; 482(9):1710-1721. PubMed ID: 38517402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model-Based ROC Curve: Examining the Effect of Case Mix and Model Calibration on the ROC Plot.
    Sadatsafavi M; Saha-Chaudhuri P; Petkau J
    Med Decis Making; 2022 May; 42(4):487-499. PubMed ID: 34657518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using treatment-tradeoff preferences to select diagnostic strategies: linking the ROC curve to threshold analysis.
    DeNeef P; Kent DL
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 8483397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves: The Basics and Beyond.
    Chang PW; Newman TB
    Hosp Pediatr; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e330-e334. PubMed ID: 38932727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of methods for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
    Centor RM; Schwartz JS
    Med Decis Making; 1985; 5(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3841685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction: decision analysis to the rescue.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    Discov Med; 2012 Sep; 14(76):181-8. PubMed ID: 23021372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.
    Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal Joint Detection and Estimation That Maximizes ROC-Type Curves.
    Wunderlich A; Goossens B; Abbey CK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2164-73. PubMed ID: 27093544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.
    Subtil F; Rabilloud M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Putting risk prediction in perspective: relative utility curves.
    Baker SG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Nov; 101(22):1538-42. PubMed ID: 19843888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.