198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37991116)
21. Tendon mechanobiology: experimental models require mathematical underpinning.
Thompson MS
Bull Math Biol; 2013 Aug; 75(8):1238-54. PubMed ID: 23681792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multirate method for co-simulation of electrical-chemical systems in multiscale modeling.
Brocke E; Djurfeldt M; Bhalla US; Kotaleski JH; Hanke M
J Comput Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 42(3):245-256. PubMed ID: 28389716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Examples of multiscale and multiphysics numerical modeling of biological tissues.
George D; Spingarn C; Dissaux C; Nierenberger M; Rahman RA; Rémond Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2017; 28(s1):S15-S27. PubMed ID: 28372275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimization Framework for Patient-Specific Cardiac Modeling.
Mineroff J; McCulloch AD; Krummen D; Ganapathysubramanian B; Krishnamurthy A
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2019 Dec; 10(4):553-567. PubMed ID: 31531820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accurate modelling of unsteady flows in collapsible tubes.
Marchandise E; Flaud P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 20373183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multiscale systems integration in the eye.
Jacobs MD
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med; 2009; 1(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 20835980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ocular Fluid Mechanics and Drug Delivery: A Review of Mathematical and Computational Models.
Bhandari A
Pharm Res; 2021 Dec; 38(12):2003-2033. PubMed ID: 34936067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reproduction of continuous flow left ventricular assist device experimental data by means of a hybrid cardiovascular model with baroreflex control.
Fresiello L; Zieliński K; Jacobs S; Di Molfetta A; Pałko KJ; Bernini F; Martin M; Claus P; Ferrari G; Trivella MG; Górczyńska K; Darowski M; Meyns B; Kozarski M
Artif Organs; 2014 Jun; 38(6):456-68. PubMed ID: 24117988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An interactive simulation tool for patient-specific clinical decision support in single-ventricle physiology.
Conover T; Hlavacek AM; Migliavacca F; Kung E; Dorfman A; Figliola RS; Hsia TY;
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):712-721. PubMed ID: 29061467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sensitivity Analysis of a Mathematical Model Simulating the Post-Hepatectomy Hemodynamics Response.
Sala L; Golse N; Joosten A; Vibert E; Vignon-Clementel I
Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 51(1):270-289. PubMed ID: 36326994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model--a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007.
Radaelli AG; Augsburger L; Cebral JR; Ohta M; Rüfenacht DA; Balossino R; Benndorf G; Hose DR; Marzo A; Metcalfe R; Mortier P; Mut F; Reymond P; Socci L; Verhegghe B; Frangi AF
J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2069-81. PubMed ID: 18582891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A numerical framework to investigate hemodynamics during endovascular mechanical recanalization in acute stroke.
Neidlin M; Büsen M; Brockmann C; Wiesmann M; Sonntag SJ; Steinseifer U; Kaufmann TA
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Apr; 32(4):e02748. PubMed ID: 26420012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Using biomechanics to investigate the effect of VR on eye vergence system.
Iskander J; Hossny M; Nahavandi S
Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102883. PubMed ID: 31422246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Osteoarthritis year in review 2016: mechanics.
Saxby DJ; Lloyd DG
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2017 Feb; 25(2):190-198. PubMed ID: 28100420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computational haemodynamics in stenotic internal jugular veins.
Caiazzo A; Montecinos G; Müller LO; Haacke EM; Toro EF
J Math Biol; 2015 Mar; 70(4):745-72. PubMed ID: 24671429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multiscale modeling methods in biomechanics.
Bhattacharya P; Viceconti M
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med; 2017 May; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 28102563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.
Hicks JL; Uchida TK; Seth A; Rajagopal A; Delp SL
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Feb; 137(2):020905. PubMed ID: 25474098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A 1D-0D-3D coupled model for simulating blood flow and transport processes in breast tissue.
Fritz M; Köppl T; Oden JT; Wagner A; Wohlmuth B; Wu C
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 38(7):e3612. PubMed ID: 35522186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modular use of human body models of varying levels of complexity: Validation of head kinematics.
Decker W; Koya B; Davis ML; Gayzik FS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S155-S160. PubMed ID: 28414545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A review on the reliability of hemodynamic modeling in intracranial aneurysms: why computational fluid dynamics alone cannot solve the equation.
Berg P; Saalfeld S; Voß S; Beuing O; Janiga G
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E15. PubMed ID: 31261119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
