These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3799179)

  • 1. [Prediction of speech audiometry as compared to pure-tone audiometry in the estimation of the importance of noise].
    De Heyn G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1986; 40(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 3799179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Hearing loss among premature and full-term infants in Rinköbing county. Results of tone and speech audiometry].
    Birkebaek NH; Tommerup BE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Jan; 153(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 1989362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Determination of hearing loss and disability assessment from pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in occupational noise-induced hearing loss].
    Brusis T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):732-8. PubMed ID: 9081278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Utility and limitations of speech audiometry testing in the detection of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting].
    Babin E; Bequignon A; Goullet de Rugy M; Edy E; Moreau S; Izard JP; Valdazo A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 12723484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Current audiological tests in the diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss caused by noise].
    Diskalenko VV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1990; (6):12-4. PubMed ID: 2075669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Early diagnosis of neurosensory component in various forms of conductive hearing loss].
    Magomedov MM; Ivanets IV; Muratov DL
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1997; (3):25-9. PubMed ID: 9229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Relations between the discriminatory curve in the speech audiogram and tone audiometric measurement data (author's transl)].
    Tymnik G; Kessler L; Koch R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1982 Mar; 61(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 7098704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Significance of ERA for differentiating hearing disorders of different origins].
    Schmidt W; Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD
    HNO; 1983 Apr; 31(4):109-16. PubMed ID: 6853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiological management of noise induced hearing loss.
    Arslan E; Orzan E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():131-45. PubMed ID: 9505306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions as a sensitive indicator of hearing loss in pilots.
    Zhang Y; Zhang X; Zhu W; Zheng X; Deng X
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2004 Jan; 75(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 14736132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Relations between pure-tone threshold and discrimination of monosyllables in inner ear high-frequency hearing disorders].
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E
    HNO; 1984 Feb; 32(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 6706703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Lyregaard PE
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing in military pilots: one-time audiometry in pilots of fighters, transports, and helicopters.
    Raynal M; Kossowski M; Job A
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jan; 77(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 16422455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.