These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37992181)
41. The importance of reconstruction nailing for diaphyseal atypical femoral fractures: a comparative study with standard nailing. Oh CW; Kim JW; Park KH; Oh JK; Yoon YC; Chung SH Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Oct; 142(10):2677-2683. PubMed ID: 34244873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prophylactic Fixation Can Be Cost-effective in Preventing a Contralateral Bisphosphonate-associated Femur Fracture. Jiang SY; Kaufman DJ; Chien BY; Longoria M; Shachter R; Bishop JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Mar; 477(3):480-490. PubMed ID: 30394950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Outcomes of Angular Stable Locking System in Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures of Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Comparative Study. Hwang KT; Kook I; Lee JH; Oh CW; Sohn OJ; Kim JW; Park KC Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 37274487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Subtrochanteric femoral fractures treated with the Long Gamma3® nail: A historical control case study versus Long trochanteric Gamma nail®. Georgiannos D; Lampridis V; Bisbinas I Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Oct; 101(6):675-80. PubMed ID: 26315346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Subtrochanteric nonunion after intramedullary nailing due to pathological fracture: proximal femoral replacement as a salvage approach. Markowitz MI; Al-Hardan W; Constantinescu DS; Pretell-Mazzini J; Conway SA Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):167-173. PubMed ID: 37386190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Is a Cephalomedullary Nail Durable Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Peritrochanteric Disease? Chafey DH; Lewis VO; Satcher RL; Moon BS; Lin PP Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2392-2401. PubMed ID: 30299285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Quality differences in multifragmentary pertrochanteric fractures [OTA 31A2.2 and 31A2.3] treated with short and long cephalomedullary nails. Parola R; Maseda M; Herbosa CG; Konda SR; Ganta A; Egol KA Injury; 2022 Jul; 53(7):2600-2604. PubMed ID: 35643558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Integrated dual lag screws versus single lag screw cephalomedullary nail constructs: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Onggo JR; Nambiar M; Onggo JD; Ambikaipalan A; Singh PJ; Babazadeh S Hip Int; 2022 Jul; 32(4):550-557. PubMed ID: 33566701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The role of an augmentative plating in the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion. Kim JW; Oh CW; Park KH; Oh JK; Yoon YC; Hong W; Kim J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Aug; 143(8):4915-4923. PubMed ID: 36624207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures: An Observational Study of 13,232 Fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register. Grønhaug KML; Dybvik E; Matre K; Östman B; Gjertsen JE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Aug; 105(16):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 37418538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Healing delayed but generally reliable after bisphosphonate-associated complete femur fractures treated with IM nails. Egol KA; Park JH; Rosenberg ZS; Peck V; Tejwani NC Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2728-34. PubMed ID: 23604648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reamed Versus Unreamed Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures, Is It Time? Pitts CC; Montgomery TP; Hess MC; Smith WR; Quade JH J Orthop Trauma; 2020 May; 34(5):252-257. PubMed ID: 31688435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femur fractures. Tazawa R; Minehara H; Matsuura T; Kawamura T; Sakai R; Yoshida K; Inoue G; Takaso M J Orthop Sci; 2021 Mar; 26(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 32245694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Comparison of long Gamma 3 nail and proximal femur locking plate for the treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures]. Han L; Hu YG; Wang CF; Fang WL; Jin B; Xu SC Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Feb; 32(2):105-110. PubMed ID: 30884924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures? Kuhl M; Beimel C Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2132-2144. PubMed ID: 32496321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail. Park SY; Yang KH; Yoo JH; Yoon HK; Park HW J Trauma; 2008 Oct; 65(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 18849802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in a Level I Trauma Center in Finland: What Complications Can be Expected? Lähdesmäki M; Ylitalo AA; Karjalainen L; Uimonen M; Mattila VM; Repo JP Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Feb; 482(2):278-288. PubMed ID: 37582281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Results of treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures with the AO/ASIF Long Trochanteric Fixation Nail (LTFN). Muñoz-Mahamud E; Bori G; Cuñé J; Font L; Domingo A; Suso S Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Dec; 76(6):451-5. PubMed ID: 20067691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Atypical Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Might be Considered a Distinct Subtype of Atypical Femoral Fracture: A Retrospective Study. Huang K; Zeng Y; Zhang Q; Tan J; Li H; Yang J; Xie H; Shen B Orthop Surg; 2024 Oct; 16(10):2454-2463. PubMed ID: 39072929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]