These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37992241)

  • 1. Recent Advances in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Imaging of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Wang X; Pu J
    Small Methods; 2024 Mar; 8(3):e2301170. PubMed ID: 37992241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction.
    Wong DT; Richardson JD; Puri R; Nelson AJ; Bertaso AG; Teo KS; Worthley MI; Worthley SG
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1757-68. PubMed ID: 22447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction.
    Ibrahim T; Bülow HP; Hackl T; Hörnke M; Nekolla SG; Breuer M; Schömig A; Schwaiger M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 49(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 17222732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Myocardial strain assessment by cine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using non-rigid registration.
    Tsadok Y; Friedman Z; Haluska BA; Hoffmann R; Adam D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 34(4):381-90. PubMed ID: 26723847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-contrast assessment of microvascular integrity using arterial spin labeled cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction.
    Do HP; Ramanan V; Qi X; Barry J; Wright GA; Ghugre NR; Nayak KS
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 29961424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of area at risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction by T1- and T2-mapping sequences in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to Tc99m-sestamibi SPECT.
    Langhans B; Nadjiri J; Jähnichen C; Kastrati A; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Oct; 30(7):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24984612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI is superior to non-contrast mapping to predict left ventricular remodeling at 6 months after acute myocardial infarction.
    Chen H; Erley J; Muellerleile K; Saering D; Jahnke C; Cavus E; Schneider JN; Blankenberg S; Lund GK; Adam G; Tahir E; Sinn M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Mar; 34(3):1863-1874. PubMed ID: 37665392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmental strain for scar detection in acute myocardial infarcts and in follow-up exams using non-contrast CMR cine sequences.
    Polacin M; Karolyi M; Eberhard M; Matziris I; Alkadhi H; Kozerke S; Manka R
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 May; 22(1):226. PubMed ID: 35585495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microvascular perfusion in infarcted and remote myocardium after successful primary PCI: angiographic and CMR findings.
    Bethke A; Shanmuganathan L; Andersen GØ; Eritsland J; Swanson D; Kløw NE; Hoffmann P
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):941-950. PubMed ID: 29980929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional and prognostic implications of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking-derived remote myocardial strain analyses in patients following acute myocardial infarction.
    Lange T; Stiermaier T; Backhaus SJ; Boom PC; Kowallick JT; de Waha-Thiele S; Lotz J; Kutty S; Bigalke B; Gutberlet M; Feistritzer HJ; Desch S; Hasenfuß G; Thiele H; Eitel I; Schuster A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Feb; 110(2):270-280. PubMed ID: 33083869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Serial assessments of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance predict contractile recovery and clinical outcome after reperfused acute myocardial infarction.
    Abegunewardene N; Kreitner KF; Oberholzer K; Vosseler M; Schmidt KH; Wimmer E; Elsäßer A; Gori T; Düber C; Münzel T; Horstick G
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2015 Sep; 62(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 26444606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic significance of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Update 2010.
    Hombach V; Merkle N; Bernhard P; Rasche V; Rottbauer W
    Cardiol J; 2010; 17(6):549-57. PubMed ID: 21154256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessing myocardial viability.
    Kwong RY; Korlakunta H
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Feb; 19(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 18690157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of myocardial area at risk with T2-weighted CMR: comparison with contrast-enhanced CMR and coronary angiography.
    Wright J; Adriaenssens T; Dymarkowski S; Desmet W; Bogaert J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 19608131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dark-Blood Delayed Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance of Myocardial Infarction.
    Kim HW; Rehwald WG; Jenista ER; Wendell DC; Filev P; van Assche L; Jensen CJ; Parker MA; Chen EL; Crowley ALC; Klem I; Judd RM; Kim RJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 11(12):1758-1769. PubMed ID: 29248655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance: extracellular volume, native T1 and 18F-FDG PET/CMR imaging in patients after revascularized myocardial infarction and association with markers of myocardial damage and systemic inflammation.
    Kunze KP; Dirschinger RJ; Kossmann H; Hanus F; Ibrahim T; Laugwitz KL; Schwaiger M; Rischpler C; Nekolla SG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 May; 20(1):33. PubMed ID: 29792210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac magnetic resonance derived late microvascular obstruction assessment post ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is the best predictor of left ventricular function: a comparison of angiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance derived measurements.
    Wong DT; Leung MC; Richardson JD; Puri R; Bertaso AG; Williams K; Meredith IT; Teo KS; Worthley MI; Worthley SG
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):1971-81. PubMed ID: 22310980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A non-contrast CMR index for assessing myocardial fibrosis.
    Yin Q; Abendschein D; Muccigrosso D; O'Connor R; Goldstein T; Chen R; Zheng J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 42():69-73. PubMed ID: 28461132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complementary prognostic values of stress myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
    Steel K; Broderick R; Gandla V; Larose E; Resnic F; Jerosch-Herold M; Brown KA; Kwong RY
    Circulation; 2009 Oct; 120(14):1390-400. PubMed ID: 19770399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Native T1 mapping to detect extent of acute and chronic myocardial infarction: comparison with late gadolinium enhancement technique.
    Dastidar AG; Harries I; Pontecorboli G; Bruno VD; De Garate E; Moret C; Baritussio A; Johnson TW; McAlindon E; Bucciarelli-Ducci C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):517-527. PubMed ID: 30357547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.