These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37992412)

  • 1. Voice Discrimination in Quiet and in Background Noise by Simulated and Real Cochlear Implant Users.
    Levin M; Zaltz Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Dec; 66(12):5169-5186. PubMed ID: 37992412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.
    Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Eisenberg LS; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 31107364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants Show Better Perception of Voice Cues and Speech in Competing Speech Than Postlingually Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Nagels L; Gaudrain E; Vickers D; Hendriks P; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):952-968. PubMed ID: 38616318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.
    Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Kishon-Rabin L; Eisenberg LS
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 19(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 29313147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Spectral Contrast Enhancement on Speech-on-Speech Intelligibility and Voice Cue Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Users.
    El Boghdady N; Langner F; Gaudrain E; Başkent D; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):271-289. PubMed ID: 32925307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):226-237. PubMed ID: 28799983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
    Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
    Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training of Speech Perception in Noise in Pre-Lingual Hearing Impaired Adults With Cochlear Implants Compared With Normal Hearing Adults.
    Bugannim Y; Roth DA; Zechoval D; Kishon-Rabin L
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e316-e325. PubMed ID: 30741913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-Analysis on the Identification of Linguistic and Emotional Prosody in Cochlear Implant Users and Vocoder Simulations.
    Everhardt MK; Sarampalis A; Coler M; Başkent D; Lowie W
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 32251011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
    Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.