158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37993082)
1. Development of a read-across-derived classification model for the predictions of mutagenicity data and its comparison with traditional QSAR models and expert systems.
Pandey SK; Roy K
Toxicology; 2023 Dec; 500():153676. PubMed ID: 37993082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction-Inspired Intelligent Training for the Development of Classification Read-across Structure-Activity Relationship (c-RASAR) Models for Organic Skin Sensitizers: Assessment of Classification Error Rate from Novel Similarity Coefficients.
Banerjee A; Roy K
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1518-1531. PubMed ID: 37584642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A practice of expert review by read-across using QSAR Toolbox.
Fukuchi J; Kitazawa A; Hirabayashi K; Honma M
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 30690463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction on the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using quantum chemistry descriptors based QSAR and machine learning derived classification methods.
Hao Y; Sun G; Fan T; Sun X; Liu Y; Zhang N; Zhao L; Zhong R; Peng Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Dec; 186():109822. PubMed ID: 31634658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ARKA: a framework of dimensionality reduction for machine-learning classification modeling, risk assessment, and data gap-filling of sparse environmental toxicity data.
Banerjee A; Roy K
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2024 Jun; 26(6):991-1007. PubMed ID: 38743054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards quantitative read across: Prediction of Ames mutagenicity in a large database.
Benigni R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Nov; 108():104434. PubMed ID: 31374229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QSAR models to predict mutagenicity of acrylates, methacrylates and alpha,beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.
Pérez-Garrido A; Helguera AM; Rodríguez FG; Cordeiro MN
Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):397-415. PubMed ID: 20122717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On Some Novel Similarity-Based Functions Used in the ML-Based q-RASAR Approach for Efficient Quantitative Predictions of Selected Toxicity End Points.
Banerjee A; Roy K
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Mar; 36(3):446-464. PubMed ID: 36811528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In silico prediction of the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using a novel two-QSAR approach.
Ding YL; Lyu YC; Leong MK
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Apr; 40():102-114. PubMed ID: 28027902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.
Feeney SV; Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 37477941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First report of q-RASAR modeling toward an approach of easy interpretability and efficient transferability.
Banerjee A; Roy K
Mol Divers; 2022 Oct; 26(5):2847-2862. PubMed ID: 35767129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-Descriptor Read Across (MuDRA): A Simple and Transparent Approach for Developing Accurate Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models.
Alves VM; Golbraikh A; Capuzzi SJ; Liu K; Lam WI; Korn DR; Pozefsky D; Andrade CH; Muratov EN; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jun; 58(6):1214-1223. PubMed ID: 29809005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel QSAR model of Salmonella mutagenicity and its application in the safety assessment of drug impurities.
Valencia A; Prous J; Mora O; Sadrieh N; Valerio LG
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 273(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 24090816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of PAH mutagenicity in human cells by QSAR classification.
Papa E; Pilutti P; Gramatica P
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(1-2):115-27. PubMed ID: 18311639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative read-across structure-activity relationship (q-RASAR): A novel approach to estimate the subchronic oral safety (NOAEL) of diverse organic chemicals in rats.
Ghosh S; Roy K
Toxicology; 2024 Jun; 505():153824. PubMed ID: 38705560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Merging applicability domains for in silico assessment of chemical mutagenicity.
Liu R; Wallqvist A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 24494696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.
Honma M; Kitazawa A; Cayley A; Williams RV; Barber C; Hanser T; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Myatt GJ; Cross KP; Benfenati E; Raitano G; Mekenyan O; Petkov P; Bossa C; Benigni R; Battistelli CL; Giuliani A; Tcheremenskaia O; DeMeo C; Norinder U; Koga H; Jose C; Jeliazkova N; Kochev N; Paskaleva V; Yang C; Daga PR; Clark RD; Rathman J
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 30357358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Approaches for externally validated QSAR modelling of Nitrated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon mutagenicity.
Gramatica P; Pilutti P; Papa E
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):169-78. PubMed ID: 17365967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a new quantitative structure-activity relationship model for predicting Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals using StarDrop™ auto-Modeller™.
Kasamatsu T; Kitazawa A; Tajima S; Kaneko M; Sugiyama KI; Yamada M; Yasui M; Masumura K; Horibata K; Honma M
Genes Environ; 2021 Apr; 43(1):16. PubMed ID: 33931133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
