124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37993370)
1. Men's Acceptance of Screening for Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate Biopsy.
Godtman RA; Pettersson C; Svensson L; Kohestani K; Stinesen Bratt K; Wallström J; Månsson M; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):553-562. PubMed ID: 37993370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomarker vs MRI-Enhanced Strategies for Prostate Cancer Screening: The STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.
Björnebo L; Discacciati A; Falagario U; Vigneswaran HT; Jäderling F; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Nordström T; Lantz A
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e247131. PubMed ID: 38648061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Within the Göteborg Randomised Screening Trial.
Grenabo Bergdahl A; Wilderäng U; Aus G; Carlsson S; Damber JE; Frånlund M; Geterud K; Khatami A; Socratous A; Stranne J; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):566-573. PubMed ID: 26724840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate Cancer Screening with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results from the Second Round of the Göteborg Prostate Cancer Screening 2 Trial.
Wallström J; Geterud K; Kohestani K; Maier SE; Pihl CG; Socratous A; Stranne J; Arnsrud-Godtman R; Månsson M; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 34580053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The GÖTEBORG prostate cancer screening 2 trial: a prospective, randomised, population-based prostate cancer screening trial with prostate-specific antigen testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.
Kohestani K; Månsson M; Arnsrud Godtman R; Stranne J; Wallström J; Carlsson S; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Scand J Urol; 2021 Apr; 55(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 33612068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Head-to-head Comparison of Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Strategies Using the Stockholm3 Test, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Swedish National Guidelines: Results from a Prospective Population-based Screening Study.
Waldén M; Aldrimer M; Lagerlöf JH; Eklund M; Grönberg H; Nordström T; Palsdottir T
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Apr; 38():32-39. PubMed ID: 35495282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Burak P; Connor MJ; Day E; Evans M; Fiorentino F; Gammon M; Hosking-Jervis F; Klimowska-Nassar N; McGuire W; Padhani AR; Prevost AT; Price D; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Mar; 7(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 33570542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of 4Kscore as a Reflex Test to Prostate-specific Antigen in the GÖTEBORG-2 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
Josefsson A; Månsson M; Kohestani K; Spyratou V; Wallström J; Hellström M; Lilja H; Vickers A; Carlsson SV; Godtman R; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38772787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Active is Active Surveillance? Intensity of Followup during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in the United States.
Loeb S; Walter D; Curnyn C; Gold HT; Lepor H; Makarov DV
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):721-6. PubMed ID: 26946161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prostate cancer - diagnostics and screening].
Arnsrud Godtman R; Bratt O; Nordström T; Wallström J; Hugosson J
Lakartidningen; 2024 Apr; 121():. PubMed ID: 38647107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prostate cancer screening-current overview].
De Vrieze M; Hübner A; Al-Monajjed R; Albers P; Radtke JP; Schimmöller L; Boschheidgen M
Radiologie (Heidelb); 2024 Jun; 64(6):479-487. PubMed ID: 38743100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer testing following a negative prostate biopsy: over testing the elderly.
Hoffman RM; Denberg T; Hunt WC; Hamilton AS
J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1139-43. PubMed ID: 17554589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.
Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; Rannikko A; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):814-21. PubMed ID: 26138043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.
Rannikko A; Leht M; Mirtti T; Kenttämies A; Tolonen T; Rinta-Kiikka I; Kilpeläinen TP; Natunen K; Lilja H; Lehtimäki T; Raitanen J; Kujala P; Ronkainen J; Matikainen M; Petas A; Taari K; Tammela T; Auvinen A
BJU Int; 2022 Aug; 130(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 34958531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.
Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
