135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37993370)
21. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Opportunistic testing versus organized prostate-specific antigen screening: outcome after 18 years in the Göteborg randomized population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
Arnsrud Godtman R; Holmberg E; Lilja H; Stranne J; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 25556937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Grönberg H; Eklund M; Picker W; Aly M; Jäderling F; Adolfsson J; Landquist M; Haug ES; Ström P; Carlsson S; Nordström T
Eur Urol; 2018 Dec; 74(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30001824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level--can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
Abd-Alazeez M; Ahmed HU; Arya M; Charman SC; Anastasiadis E; Freeman A; Emberton M; Kirkham A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):45.e17-22. PubMed ID: 24055430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Men's preferences and trade-offs for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment.
Howard K; Salkeld GP; Patel MI; Mann GJ; Pignone MP
Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):3123-35. PubMed ID: 25382490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prostate MRI versus PSA screening for prostate cancer detection (the MVP Study): a randomised clinical trial.
Nam R; Patel C; Milot L; Hird A; Wallis C; Macinnis P; Singh M; Emmenegger U; Sherman C; Haider MA
BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e059482. PubMed ID: 36351725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Population-based Organised Prostate Cancer Testing: Results from the First Invitation of 50-year-old Men.
Bratt O; Godtman RA; Jiborn T; Wallström J; Akre O; Carlsson S; Nordström T; Thimansson E; Alterbeck M; Zackrisson S; Hugosson J; Bjartell A; Lantz A
Eur Urol; 2024 Mar; 85(3):207-214. PubMed ID: 38042646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.
Rannikko A; Leht M; Mirtti T; Kenttämies A; Tolonen T; Rinta-Kiikka I; Kilpeläinen TP; Natunen K; Lilja H; Lehtimäki T; Raitanen J; Kujala P; Ronkainen J; Matikainen M; Petas A; Taari K; Tammela T; Auvinen A
BJU Int; 2022 Aug; 130(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 34958531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.
Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Cattarino S; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Salciccia S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 22564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels.
Lawrentschuk N; Fleshner N
BJU Int; 2009 Mar; 103(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19154475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study of Risk-adapted Ultrasound-directed and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Wagensveld IM; Osses DF; Groenendijk PM; Zijta FM; Busstra MB; Rociu E; Barentsz JO; Michiel Sedelaar JP; Arbeel B; Roeleveld T; Geenen R; Koeter I; van der Meer SA; Cappendijk V; Somford R; Klaver S; Van der Lely H; Wolters T; Hellings W; Leter MR; Van der Poel HG; Heijmink SWTPJ; Debruyne F; Immerzeel J; Leijte J; van Roermund J; Miclea R; Planken E; Vis AN; Jan de Jong I; Tijsterman J; Wolterbeek D; Claessen A; Vrijhof E; Nederend J; Van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Remmers S; Schoots IG;
Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):318-326. PubMed ID: 35341658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The combined role of MRI prostate and prostate health index in improving detection of significant prostate cancer in a screening population of Chinese men.
Chiu PK; Lam TY; Ng CF; Teoh JY; Cho CC; Hung HY; Hong C; Roobol MJ; Chu WC; Wong SY; Sung JJ
Asian J Androl; 2023 Nov; 25(6):674-679. PubMed ID: 37534902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Kasabwala K; Xu C; Robinson BD; Khani F; Wang Y; Margolis D; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 31100246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Targeted prostate cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the initial screening round of the IMPACT study.
Bancroft EK; Page EC; Castro E; Lilja H; Vickers A; Sjoberg D; Assel M; Foster CS; Mitchell G; Drew K; Mæhle L; Axcrona K; Evans DG; Bulman B; Eccles D; McBride D; van Asperen C; Vasen H; Kiemeney LA; Ringelberg J; Cybulski C; Wokolorczyk D; Selkirk C; Hulick PJ; Bojesen A; Skytte AB; Lam J; Taylor L; Oldenburg R; Cremers R; Verhaegh G; van Zelst-Stams WA; Oosterwijk JC; Blanco I; Salinas M; Cook J; Rosario DJ; Buys S; Conner T; Ausems MG; Ong KR; Hoffman J; Domchek S; Powers J; Teixeira MR; Maia S; Foulkes WD; Taherian N; Ruijs M; Helderman-van den Enden AT; Izatt L; Davidson R; Adank MA; Walker L; Schmutzler R; Tucker K; Kirk J; Hodgson S; Harris M; Douglas F; Lindeman GJ; Zgajnar J; Tischkowitz M; Clowes VE; Susman R; Ramón y Cajal T; Patcher N; Gadea N; Spigelman A; van Os T; Liljegren A; Side L; Brewer C; Brady AF; Donaldson A; Stefansdottir V; Friedman E; Chen-Shtoyerman R; Amor DJ; Copakova L; Barwell J; Giri VN; Murthy V; Nicolai N; Teo SH; Greenhalgh L; Strom S; Henderson A; McGrath J; Gallagher D; Aaronson N; Ardern-Jones A; Bangma C; Dearnaley D; Costello P; Eyfjord J; Rothwell J; Falconer A; Gronberg H; Hamdy FC; Johannsson O; Khoo V; Kote-Jarai Z; Lubinski J; Axcrona U; Melia J; McKinley J; Mitra AV; Moynihan C; Rennert G; Suri M; Wilson P; Killick E; ; Moss S; Eeles RA
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):489-99. PubMed ID: 24484606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Poor Follow-up After Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Tests: A Population-based Cohort Study.
Aly M; Clements M; Weibull CE; Nordström T; Näslund E; Adolfsson J; Grönberg H
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):842-848. PubMed ID: 29433987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
