131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37993703)
21. Comparison of manual and dose reduction modes of a MORITA R100 CBCT.
Rottke D; Dreger J; Sawada K; Honda K; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180009. PubMed ID: 30182744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Proposed Diagnostic Reference Levels in the Missouri/Southern Illinois Region Associated with Cone-beam Computed Tomography Use in Endodontics.
Popkowski A; Rhodes SC; Hatton JF
J Endod; 2024 Jul; 50(7):966-975. PubMed ID: 38382736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units.
Ludlow JB; Timothy R; Walker C; Hunter R; Benavides E; Samuelson DB; Scheske MJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140197. PubMed ID: 25224586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric evaluation for temporomandibular joint cone beam computed tomography exams using different field of view.
Pinto CA; Caetano GFDR; Andrade MEA; Panzarella FK; Junqueira JLC; Peroni LV; Nascimento MDCC
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Sep; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34488205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units.
Al Najjar A; Colosi D; Dauer LT; Prins R; Patchell G; Branets I; Goren AD; Faber RD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 23726328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices.
Lindfors N; Lund H; Johansson H; Ekestubbe A
Eur J Radiol Open; 2017; 4():132-137. PubMed ID: 29159206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effective dose estimation in cone-beam computed tomography for dental use by Monte-Carlo simulation optimizing calculation numbers using a step-and-shoot method.
Ozaki Y; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Oct; 50(7):20210084. PubMed ID: 33929892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimation of organ and effective doses of CBCT scans of radiotherapy using size-specific field of view (FOV): a Monte Carlo study.
Abuhaimed A; Mujammami H; AlEnazi K; Abanomy A; Alashban Y; Martin CJ
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38536632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rotating and translating anthropomorphic head voxel models to establish an horizontal Frankfort plane for dental CBCT Monte Carlo simulations: a dose comparison study.
Stratis A; Zhang G; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(24):N681-N696. PubMed ID: 27893451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monte Carlo simulations of organ and effective doses and dose-length product for dental cone-beam CT.
Terashima S; Sano J; Osanai M; Toshima K; Ohuchi K; Hosokawa Y
Oral Radiol; 2024 Jan; 40(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 37597068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography.
Ludlow JB; Walker C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):802-17. PubMed ID: 24286904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of varying cone beam computed tomography image resolution and field-of-view centralization on effective radiation dose.
Jadu FM; Alzahrani AA; Almutairi MA; Al-Amoudi SO; Jan AM; Khafaji MA
Saudi Med J; 2018 May; 39(5):470-475. PubMed ID: 29738006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetry of Three Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Scanners at Different Fields of View in Terms of Various Head and Neck Organs.
Nikneshan S; Aghamiri MR; Moudi E; Bahemmat N; Hadian H
Iran J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 13(3):e34220. PubMed ID: 27853498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiation exposure in cone beam CT measured using a MOSFET and RPLGD dosimeter and Monte Carlo simulation in phantom.
Kweon DC
J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(4):837-852. PubMed ID: 37248944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations.
Kralik I; Faj D; Lauc T; Škarica M; Popić J; Brkic H
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 30264736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Nambiar P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(2):20130329. PubMed ID: 24265395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monte Carlo modeling for dose assessment in cone beam CT for oral and maxillofacial applications.
Zhang G; Marshall N; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):072103. PubMed ID: 23822447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
