These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37994358)

  • 21. Time-series forecasting using manifold learning, radial basis function interpolation, and geometric harmonics.
    Papaioannou PG; Talmon R; Kevrekidis IG; Siettos C
    Chaos; 2022 Aug; 32(8):083113. PubMed ID: 36049932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physics-driven learning of x-ray skin dose distribution in interventional procedures.
    Roser P; Zhong X; Birkhold A; Strobel N; Kowarschik M; Fahrig R; Maier A
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4654-4665. PubMed ID: 31407346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Uncertainty quantification patterns for multiscale models.
    Ye D; Veen L; Nikishova A; Lakhlili J; Edeling W; Luk OO; Krzhizhanovskaya VV; Hoekstra AG
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200072. PubMed ID: 33775139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Super-Resolved q-Space deep learning with uncertainty quantification.
    Qin Y; Liu Z; Liu C; Li Y; Zeng X; Ye C
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Jan; 67():101885. PubMed ID: 33227600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uncertainty quantification of TMS simulations considering MRI segmentation errors.
    Zhang H; Gomez LJ; Guilleminot J
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Mar; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35169105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Data-efficient Bayesian learning for radial dynamic MR reconstruction.
    Brahma S; Kolbitsch C; Martin J; Schaeffter T; Kofler A
    Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6955-6977. PubMed ID: 37367947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fast uncertainty quantification for dynamic flux balance analysis using non-smooth polynomial chaos expansions.
    Paulson JA; Martin-Casas M; Mesbah A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1007308. PubMed ID: 31469832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fast Surrogate Modeling using Dimensionality Reduction in Model Inputs and Field Output: Application to Additive Manufacturing.
    Vohra M; Nath P; Mahadevan S; Lee YT
    Reliab Eng Syst Saf; 2020; 201():. PubMed ID: 33100595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitivity of ecological models to their climate drivers: statistical ensembles for forcing.
    Fuentes M; Kittel TG; Nychka D
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Feb; 16(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 16705964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The two-dimensional Monte Carlo: a new methodologic paradigm for dose reconstruction for epidemiological studies.
    Simon SL; Hoffman FO; Hofer E
    Radiat Res; 2015 Jan; 183(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 25496314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiscale Model for In-Stent Restenosis.
    Nikishova A; Veen L; Zun P; Hoekstra AG
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):761-774. PubMed ID: 30136082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.
    Seo J; Schiavazzi DE; Kahn AM; Marsden AL
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Aug; 36(8):e3351. PubMed ID: 32419369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Region-based evidential deep learning to quantify uncertainty and improve robustness of brain tumor segmentation.
    Li H; Nan Y; Del Ser J; Yang G
    Neural Comput Appl; 2023; 35(30):22071-22085. PubMed ID: 37724130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uncertainty quantification of dynamic earthquake rupture simulations.
    Daub EG; Arabnejad H; Mahmood I; Groen D
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200076. PubMed ID: 33775142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Uncertainty quantification for radiation measurements: Bottom-up error variance estimation using calibration information.
    Burr T; Croft S; Krieger T; Martin K; Norman C; Walsh S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Feb; 108():49-57. PubMed ID: 26698221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surrogate modelling for the prediction of spatial fields based on simultaneous dimensionality reduction of high-dimensional input/output spaces.
    Crevillén-García D
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Apr; 5(4):171933. PubMed ID: 29765651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scalable Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Network Potentials: Promise and Pitfalls.
    Thaler S; Doehner G; Zavadlav J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jul; 19(14):4520-4532. PubMed ID: 37014758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility.
    Volodina V; Challenor P
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200071. PubMed ID: 33775141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications.
    Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Uncertainty quantification reveals the physical constraints on pumping by peristaltic hearts.
    Waldrop LD; He Y; Battista NA; Neary Peterman T; Miller LA
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Sep; 17(170):20200232. PubMed ID: 32900306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.