121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37995664)
21. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.
Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection and localisation of primary prostate cancer using
Kalapara AA; Nzenza T; Pan HYC; Ballok Z; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Cherk M; Hofman MS; Konety BR; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Murphy DG; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 31260602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series.
Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Sorce G; Barletta F; De Angelis M; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Prostate; 2022 Sep; 82(12):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 35538401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Mattei A; Fiori C; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Moschini M; Zamboni S; Rakauskas A; Tian Z; Karakiewicz PI; De Cobelli F; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):733-741. PubMed ID: 31547938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Suboptimal Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens by mpMRI-Targeted Biopsy.
Karsiyakali N; Ozgen MB; Ozveren B; Akbal C; Dincer A; Durak H; Turkeri L
Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():217-223. PubMed ID: 32871139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of Sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Kilic M; Vural M; Coskun B; Acar Ö; Saglican Y; Akpek S; Esen T
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 31054811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The efficiency of prostate-specific antigen density measurement using three different methods on the prediction of biochemical recurrence.
Danacioglu YO; Keser F; Efiloğlu Ö; Culpan M; Polat S; Atis RG; Yildirim A
Aging Male; 2021 Dec; 24(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 34006169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy in a patient group with PI-RADS 4 and 5 targets: A single center experience.
Vural M; Coskun B; Kilic M; Durmaz S; Gumus T; Cengiz D; Onay A; Saglican Y; Colakoglu B; Akpek S; Yildirim H; Esen T; Rozanes I
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109785. PubMed ID: 34091134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China.
Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Nie L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Jin K; Li JK; Xiong XY; Yang L; Wei Q
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(6):615-619. PubMed ID: 35532555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. New prostate cancer prognostic grade group (PGG): Can multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) accurately separate patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-grade cancer?
Holtz JN; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Browning JT; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):702-712. PubMed ID: 28721479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of multiple abbreviated multiparametric MRI-derived protocols for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Cereser L; Giannarini G; Bonato F; Pizzolitto S; Como G; Valotto C; Ficarra V; Dal Moro F; Zuiani C; Girometti R
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Feb; 74(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 33016030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results with the final pathology findings for radical prostatectomy specimens in the detection of prostate cancer.
Lee CH; Ku JY; Park WY; Lee NK; Ha HK
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):e20-e27. PubMed ID: 29920966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prostate Volume Estimation on MRI: Accuracy and Effects of Ellipsoid and Bullet-Shaped Measurements on PSA Density.
Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Di Fiore GA; Picchi SG; Di Stasi M; Verde F; Petretta M; Imbriaco M; Cuocolo R
Acad Radiol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):e219-e226. PubMed ID: 32553281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
