144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37995911)
1. [Comparison of vaginal prostaglandins with oral misoprostol as a second line of cervical ripening after using a cervical balloon catheter].
Hadhoum S; Ghesquière L; Drumez E; Subtil D; Garabedian C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2024 Feb; 52(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 37995911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
Jozwiak M; Bloemenkamp KW; Kelly AJ; Mol BW; Irion O; Boulvain M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD001233. PubMed ID: 22419277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Garg R; Bagga R; Kumari A; Kalra J; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 34027782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Ghosh A; Lattey KR; Kelly AJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD006901. PubMed ID: 27918616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Levine LD; Sciscione AC; Mozurkewich EL; Ramsey PS; Adair CD; Kaunitz AM; McKinney JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S669-S695. PubMed ID: 38462252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].
Pez V; Deruelle P; Kyheng M; Boyon C; Clouqueur E; Garabedian C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018; 46(7-8):570-574. PubMed ID: 29903553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study.
Kehl S; Weiss C; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():78-82. PubMed ID: 27525685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
Boulvain M; Kelly A; Lohse C; Stan C; Irion O
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD001233. PubMed ID: 11687101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
