138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37996360)
21. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating small renal carcinoma and angiomyolipoma.
Chen L; Wang L; Diao X; Qian W; Fang L; Pang Y; Zhan J; Chen Y
Biosci Trends; 2015 Aug; 9(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 26268710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.
Li CX; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Yan LX; Zheng FY; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 26971426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differentiation of Renal Tumor Histotypes: Usefulness of Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Fan PL; Wang WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W335-42. PubMed ID: 26295670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluating the perfusion of occupying lesions of kidney and bladder with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Wang XH; Wang YJ; Lei CG
Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 22040789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Zhao P; Zhu J; Wang L; Li N; Zhang X; Li J; Luo Y; Li Q
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3766-3774. PubMed ID: 36725722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Solid Renal Masses.
Geyer T; Schwarze V; Marschner C; Schnitzer ML; Froelich MF; Rübenthaler J; Clevert DA
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Nov; 56(11):. PubMed ID: 33227984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of small renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.
Liu H; Cao H; Chen L; Fang L; Liu Y; Zhan J; Diao X; Chen Y
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jan; 12(1):106-118. PubMed ID: 34993064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography with Quantitative Analysis allows Differentiation of Renal Tumor Histotypes.
Sun D; Wei C; Li Y; Lu Q; Zhang W; Hu B
Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35081. PubMed ID: 27725761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of renal urothelial carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Xue LY; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Li CL; Yan CJ; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):e151-7. PubMed ID: 23228279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for solid mass surveillance and characterization in children with tuberous sclerosis complex: an initial experience.
Chan JP; Back SJ; Vatsky S; Calle-Toro JS; Khrichenko D; Sridharan A; Poznick L; Andronikou S
Pediatr Nephrol; 2021 Jul; 36(7):1775-1784. PubMed ID: 33582872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of CT, MRI imaging features of renal cell carcinoma with different histopathological types.
Wang X; Kong W; Wang Y; Wang Y; Chen Y; Shi Z; Liu Y
J BUON; 2021; 26(5):2053-2058. PubMed ID: 34761616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses.
Atri M; Tabatabaeifar L; Jang HJ; Finelli A; Moshonov H; Jewett M
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 25919803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Qualitative and quantitative analysis with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: diagnosis value in hypoechoic renal angiomyolipoma.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Wang WP; Li CX; Xue LY
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):334-41. PubMed ID: 25741195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Findings and Differential Diagnosis of Hepatic Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma Compared with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Huang Z; Wu X; Li S; Li K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1403-1411. PubMed ID: 32165015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Characteristics of renal occupying lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography].
Zhang S; Lin L; Li JH; Qiu L; Han P
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Nov; 45(6):984-7. PubMed ID: 25571729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma: the initial study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Lu Q; Wang W; Huang B; Li C; Li C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1896-901. PubMed ID: 22906749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Tumor grade estımatıon of clear cell and papıllary renal cell carcınomas usıng contrast-enhanced MDCT and FSE T2 weıghted MR ımagıng: radıology-pathology correlatıon.
Halefoglu AM; Ozagari AA
Radiol Med; 2021 Sep; 126(9):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 34100169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors.
Tamai H; Takiguchi Y; Oka M; Shingaki N; Enomoto S; Shiraki T; Furuta M; Inoue I; Iguchi M; Yanaoka K; Arii K; Shimizu Y; Nakata H; Shinka T; Sanke T; Ichinose M
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1635-40. PubMed ID: 16301719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Wei SP; Xu CL; Zhang Q; Zhang QR; Zhao YE; Huang PF; Xie YD; Zhou CS; Tian FL; Yang B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2135-2145. PubMed ID: 28331942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
