135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37997232)
1. Evaluation of parental perceptions of lingual and labial frenectomy on their child: a comparison of CO
Ginini JG; Rachmiel A; Bilder A; Botzer E; Capucha T; Nseir S; Ohayon C; Shilo D; Emodi O
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):30-37. PubMed ID: 37997232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: a comparison of carbon dioxide laser and scalpel techniques.
Haytac MC; Ozcelik O
J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1815-9. PubMed ID: 17076605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative frenectomy with conventional scalpel and dual-waved laser in labial frenulum.
Xie L; Wang P; Ding Y; Zhang L
World J Pediatr Surg; 2022; 5(1):e000363. PubMed ID: 36474628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of carbon dioxide laser in lingual frenectomy.
Puthussery FJ; Shekar K; Gulati A; Downie IP
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 49(7):580-1. PubMed ID: 20728254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: A comparison of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser and conventional techniques in the same patients.
Calisir M; Ege B
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Aug; 21(8):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 30074011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Study of Laser Treatment for Frenectomy of Pediatric Patients.
Komori S; Matsumoto K; Matsuo K; Suzuki H; Komori T
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 10(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 29104388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Patient's Perceptions, Healing, and Reattachment After Conventional and Diode Laser Frenectomy: A Three-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sezgin G; Öztürk Özener H; Meseli SE; Kuru L
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2020 Sep; 38(9):552-559. PubMed ID: 32609576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of topically administered 0.6% hyaluronic acid on the healing of labial frenectomy in conventional and 940-nm indium gallium arsenide phosphide (InGaAsP) diode laser techniques in pediatric patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study.
Doğan SSA; Karakan NC; Doğan Ö
Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Jan; 39(1):48. PubMed ID: 38279075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the effect of the application of hyaluronic acid following laser-assisted frenectomy: an examiner-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study.
Turgut Çankaya Z; Gürbüz S; Bakirarar B; Ünsal B; Kurtiş B
Quintessence Int; 2020; 51(3):188-201. PubMed ID: 31781694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Efficacy of Lingual Laser Frenectomy in Pediatric OSAS: A Randomized Double-Blinded and Controlled Clinical Study.
Fioravanti M; Zara F; Vozza I; Polimeni A; Sfasciotti GL
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34204017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Study on the Treatment of Ankyloglossia by Using Er:YAG Laser or Traditional Scalpel.
Shang J; Han M; Sun J; Xu D; Qu W
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 32(8):e792-e795. PubMed ID: 34704700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laser Techniques or Scalpel Incision for Labial Frenectomy: A Meta-analysis.
Protásio ACR; Galvão EL; Falci SGM
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Dec; 18(4):490-499. PubMed ID: 31624426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Maxillary Labial Frenectomy Procedure Using Diode Laser (980 nm) and Conventional Scalpel: An Observational Study.
Vincent K; Aslam S; Abida R; Thomas T; Cherian MP; Soman S
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2023 Jul; 15(Suppl 1):S688-S692. PubMed ID: 37654289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient perceptions and clinical efficacy of labial frenectomies using diode laser versus conventional techniques.
Uraz A; Çetiner FD; Cula S; Guler B; Oztoprak S
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 119(3):182-186. PubMed ID: 29410192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frenectomy with conventional scalpel and Nd:YAG laser technique: A comparative evaluation.
Yadav RK; Verma UP; Sajjanhar I; Tiwari R
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2019; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30692743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labial Frenectomy using Laser: A Scoping Review.
Dioguardi M; Ballini A; Quarta C; Caroprese M; Maci M; Spirito F; Caloro GA; Alovisi M; Basile E; Lo Muzio L
Int J Dent; 2023; 2023():7321735. PubMed ID: 37168276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of upper labial frenectomy: A randomized, controlled comparative study of conventional scalpel technique and Er:YAG laser technique.
Sarmadi R; Gabre P; Thor A
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 7(4):522-530. PubMed ID: 33369213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of diode laser and Er:YAG lasers in the treatment of ankyloglossia.
Aras MH; Göregen M; Güngörmüş M; Akgül HM
Photomed Laser Surg; 2010 Apr; 28(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 19743963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser frenectomy postoperatively less uncomfortable than scalpel frenectomy (UT CAT0769).
Cervetto S; Villar C; Ellis E
Tex Dent J; 2011 Aug; 128(8):767. PubMed ID: 21957791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the effects of high-level laser and electrocautery in lingual frenectomy surgeries in infants: protocol for a blinded randomised controlled clinical trial.
Mazzoni A; Navarro RS; Fernandes KPS; Horliana ACRT; Mesquita-Ferrari RA; Motta PB; Silva T; Gomes AO; Martimbianco ALC; Sobral APT; Santos EM; Motta LJ; Bussadori SK
BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050733. PubMed ID: 34848514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
