These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37997244)

  • 1. Commercial artificial intelligence lateral cephalometric analysis: part 2-effects of human examiners on artificial intelligence performance, a pilot study.
    Lee J; Bae SR; Noh HK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):130-141. PubMed ID: 37997244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commercial artificial intelligence lateral cephalometric analysis: part 1-the possibility of replacing manual landmarking with artificial intelligence service.
    Lee J; Bae SR; Noh HK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):106-118. PubMed ID: 37997242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of cephalometric identification performed by 2 artificial intelligence-driven tracing applications and human examiners.
    Silva TP; Pinheiro MCR; Freitas DQ; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Apr; 137(4):431-440. PubMed ID: 38365543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:
    Hwang HW; Park JH; Moon JH; Yu Y; Kim H; Her SB; Srinivasan G; Aljanabi MNA; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31335162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software.
    Menezes LDS; Silva TP; Lima Dos Santos MA; Hughes MM; Mariano Souza SDR; Leite Ribeiro PM; Freitas PHL; Takeshita WM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230065. PubMed ID: 37869886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita G; Vieira WA; Vidigal MTC; Travençolo BAN; Beaini TL; Spin-Neto R; Paranhos LR; de Brito Júnior RB
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):1158-1179. PubMed ID: 36604364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hendrickx J; Gracea RS; Vanheers M; Winderickx N; Preda F; Shujaat S; Jacobs R
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 38895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic cephalometric landmark identification with artificial intelligence: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.
    Polizzi A; Leonardi R
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105056. PubMed ID: 38729291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Guinot-Barona C; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Galán López L; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):555-565. PubMed ID: 37882509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic identification of posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using a novel deep learning algorithm: a comparative study with human experts.
    Lee H; Cho JM; Ryu S; Ryu S; Chang E; Jung YS; Kim JY
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15506. PubMed ID: 37726392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics : Evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network.
    Kunz F; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A; Zeman F; Boldt J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Jan; 81(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 31853586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
    Gliddon MJ; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Wong HT; Lasky RE; Teichgraeber JF; Jia X; Liebschner MA; Lemoine JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16413890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How much deep learning is enough for automatic identification to be reliable?
    Moon JH; Hwang HW; Yu Y; Kim MG; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Nov; 90(6):823-830. PubMed ID: 33378507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preciseness of artificial intelligence for lateral cephalometric measurements.
    El-Dawlatly M; Attia KH; Abdelghaffar AY; Mostafa YA; Abd El-Ghafour M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):27-33. PubMed ID: 36894679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.
    Bao H; Zhang K; Yu C; Li H; Cao D; Shu H; Liu L; Yan B
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):191. PubMed ID: 37005593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and clinical validity of automated cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural networks.
    Kang S; Kim I; Kim YJ; Kim N; Baek SH; Sung SJ
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Feb; 27(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 37326233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial intelligence-based cephalometric landmark annotation and measurements according to Arnett's analysis: can we trust a bot to do that?
    Silva TP; Hughes MM; Menezes LDS; de Melo MFB; Freitas PHL; Takeshita WM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20200548. PubMed ID: 33882247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration in Cephalometric Landmark Detection.
    Le VNT; Kang J; Oh IS; Kim JG; Yang YM; Lee DW
    J Pers Med; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of automated cephalometric analysis based on the latest deep learning method.
    Hwang HW; Moon JH; Kim MG; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2021 May; 91(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 33434275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?
    Ye H; Cheng Z; Ungvijanpunya N; Chen W; Cao L; Gou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):467. PubMed ID: 37422630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.